Cost of specifying maintenance/failure free operating periods for Royal Air Force aircraft

被引:6
作者
Brown, MA [1 ]
Hockley, CJ
机构
[1] Royal AF Engn Def, Procurement Agcy, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Royal Mil Coll Sci, Swindon SN6 8LA, Wilts, England
来源
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2001 PROCEEDINGS | 2001年
关键词
Maintenance Free Operating Periods; Failure Free Operating Periods; costs; HUMS;
D O I
10.1109/RAMS.2001.902503
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The Royal Air Force has been increasingly required to operate and support aircraft on deployed operations and in the most efficient way possible. In an effort to increase the availability of RAF aircraft and thus increase their effectiveness, a method of specifying reliability has been increasingly adopted that looks for success rather than the previous philosophy which accepted that failure was inevitable. M/F-FOP measures the probability that a mission or series of missions can be successfully completed without failure or without maintenance degrading the ability to conduct the next mission or series of missions. However, the M/F-FOP philosophy is still relatively immature and not been applied to many equipments so Ear delivered to service; it needs further credibility if it is to gain ground against MTBF and thus an identification of the costs involved is required. Traditional reliability philosophies such as MTBF are inherently flawed and are frequently misused causing confusion and wasted effort. On the other hand, M/F-FOP assumes that success is attainable and that the probability of that success can be accurately applied from entry into service; moreover, it specifies needs in unambiguous terms. That it is advantageous to aircraft systems has been shown in the civil aircraft field with aircraft like Boeing 777 and the Airbus Family already in service. This paper identifies and examines the cost drivers of M/F-FOP and develops them into a Metric to inform the R&M community of the financial and non-financial cost/value benefits and penalties of M/F-FOP. A method by which qualitative data could be resolved into quantitative data was developed in order to produce the Metrics. Analysis of these Metrics provided the following: Purchase cost benefits < Purchase cost penalties. Operating cost benefits > Operating cost penalties. Non-financial positive impacts > negative impacts. Of course actual costs cannot be stated or validated until Royal Air Force M/F-FOP aircraft enter service.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 432
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ANISSIPOUR A, 2000, COMMUNICATION 0414
[2]  
APPLETON DP, 1996, FUTURE OFFENSIVE AIR
[3]  
BURGESS C, 2000, COMMUNICATION 0525
[4]  
CINI PF, 1999, DESIGNING MFOP AUTON
[5]  
CROCKER J, 2000, COMMUNICATION 0509
[6]  
CROCKER J, 9 INT MIRCE S P
[7]  
KNEZEVIC J, DLM MSC COURS
[8]  
KNOWLES DI, 15 SOLE C
[9]  
MILES NB, 1984, MANAGEMENT RES, P104
[10]  
Relf MN, 1999, QUAL RELIAB ENG INT, V15, P111, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199903/04)15:2<111::AID-QRE237>3.0.CO