Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science

被引:433
作者
Thompson, Dennis F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
deliberative democracy; equality; participation; legitimacy; publicity;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Although empirical studies of deliberative democracy have proliferated in the past decade, too few have addressed the questions that are most significant in the normative theories. At the same time, many theorists have tended too easily to dismiss the empirical findings. More recently, some theorists and empiricists have been paying more attention to each other's work. Nevertheless, neither is likely to produce the more comprehensive understanding of deliberative democracy we need unless both develop a clearer conception of the elements of deliberation, the conflicts among those elements, and the structural relationships in deliberative systems.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 520
页数:24
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Ackerman B., 2004, DELIBERATION DAY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SWISS J POLITICAL SC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Research in micropolitics
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Deliberative Democracy
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents
[6]  
Bächtiger A, 2005, ACTA POLIT, V40, P153, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500108
[7]  
Bächtiger A, 2007, DELIBERATION, PARTICIPATION AND DEMOCRACY: CAN THE PEOPLE GOVERN?, P82
[8]  
Baiocchi G., 2003, DEEPENING DEMOCRACY, P45
[9]   How deliberation affects policy opinions [J].
Barabas, J .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2004, 98 (04) :687-701
[10]  
Benhabib Seyla., 1996, DEMOCRACY DIFFERENCE, P67