Monitoring and Predicting Response to Therapy with 18F-FDG PET in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

被引:157
作者
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee [1 ]
Vriens, Dennis [1 ]
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. [2 ]
van der Graaf, Winette T. A. [2 ]
Oyen, Wim J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Nucl Med, Nijmegen Med Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Med Oncol, Nijmegen Med Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
F-18-FDG PET; colorectal carcinoma; prediction; response monitoring; therapy monitoring;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.108.057224
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Molecular imaging with F-18-FDG PET has been proven useful in the management of colorectal cancer. F-18-FDG PET plays a pivotal role in staging before surgical resection of recurrent colorectal cancer and metastases, in the localization of recurrence in patients with an unexplained rise in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and in the assessment of residual masses after treatment. Currently, there is increasing interest in the role of F-18-FDG PET beyond staging. The technique appears to have significant potential for the characterization of tumors and for the prediction of prognosis in the context of treatment stratification and early assessment of tumor response to therapy. This systematic review provides an overview of the literature on the value of F-18-FDG PET for monitoring and predicting the response to therapy in colorectal cancer. The review covers chemotherapy response monitoring in advanced colorectal cancer, monitoring of the effects of local ablative therapies, and preoperative radiotherapy and multimodality treatment response evaluation in primary rectal cancer. Given the added value of F-18-FDG PET for these indications, implementation in clinical practice and systematic inclusion in therapeutic trials to exploit the potential of F-18-FDG PET are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:43S / 54S
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]
Recent chemotherapy reduces the sensitivity of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of colorectal metastases [J].
Akhurst, T ;
Kates, TJ ;
Mazumdar, M ;
Yeung, H ;
Riedel, ER ;
Burt, BM ;
Blumgart, L ;
Jarnagin, W ;
Larson, SM ;
Fong, Y .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (34) :8713-8716
[2]
Response prediction by FDG-PET after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and combined regional hyperthermia of rectal cancer:: correlation with endorectal ultrasound and histopathology [J].
Amthauer, H ;
Denecke, T ;
Rau, B ;
Hildebrandt, B ;
Hünerbein, M ;
Ruf, J ;
Schneider, U ;
Gutberlet, M ;
Schlag, PM ;
Felix, R ;
Wust, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (06) :811-819
[3]
Antoch G, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P520
[4]
Antoch G, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1339
[5]
Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET [J].
Avril, NE ;
Weber, WA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 43 (01) :189-+
[6]
Possible role of FDG-PET in the early prediction of therapy outcome in liver metastases of colorectal cancer [J].
Bender, H ;
Bangard, N ;
Metten, N ;
Bangard, M ;
Mezger, J ;
Schomburg, A ;
Biersack, HJ .
HYBRIDOMA, 1999, 18 (01) :87-91
[7]
Determinants of unresectability and outcome of patients with occult colorectal hepatic metastases [J].
Bennett, JJ ;
Cao, DC ;
Posner, MC .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 92 (01) :64-69
[8]
Beyer T, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, p25S
[9]
Rectal cancer: Local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging - A meta-analysis [J].
Bipat, S ;
Glas, AS ;
Slors, FJM ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Stoker, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :773-783
[10]
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: Protocol issues and options [J].
Blodgett, TM ;
McCook, BM ;
Federle, MP .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (02) :157-168