A method for teacher inquiry in cross-curricular projects: Lessons from a case study

被引:24
作者
Avramides, Katerina
Hunter, Jade
Oliver, Martin
Luckin, Rosemary
机构
[1] Institute of Education, London Knowledge Lab, London
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
LEARNING COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1111/bjet.12233
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many changes in teaching practices (such as introduction of e-assessment) are initiated by school management, or by a lead teacher, but have direct impact on the learning designs of others. However, models of teachers as innovators, conducting evidence-based inquiry into their students' learning, view the teacher as initiator of change in their own practice (normally as individual). This paper addresses the question of whether such models can also be applied to change introduced by top-down processes. In this paper, we examine teacher inquiry in such a context. We discuss a case study in which we worked with the Head of Science (HoS) of a secondary school. The HoS designed a cross-curricular science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project with 57 STEM teachers and introduced Google Forms as a tool for formative assessment. We supported the HoS to design and conduct an inquiry that involved all teachers. We examine the context and process of inquiry and how it was applied. Our findings provide insight into teachers' use of tools and representations when communicating about learning design, and the implications of this for the development of learning analytics tools. They also inform the development of a method for coordinating teacher inquiry in cross-curricular projects and, more generally, in the context of top-down introduction of change.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 264
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool [J].
Ali, Liaqat ;
Hatala, Marek ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Jovanovic, Jelena .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (01) :470-489
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 2 INT C LEARN AN K, DOI [10.1145/2330601.2330666, DOI 10.1145/2330601.2330666]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ethical guidelines for educational research, V4th
[5]  
Banks F., 1999, Learners andPedagogy, P89
[6]  
Bannan-Ritland B., 2008, Handbook of design research methods in education, P246
[7]  
Bennett K.R., 2009, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, V25, P99
[8]  
Bull S., 2007, INT J ARTIF INTELL E, V17, P89
[9]  
Clark W., 2013, London Knowledge Lab Report
[10]  
Clow D., 2012, P 2 INT C LEARN AN K, P134, DOI [10.1145/2330601.2330636, DOI 10.1145/2330601.2330636]