Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: Improved image quality and reduced radiation dose

被引:412
作者
Earls, James P. [1 ]
Berman, Elise L. [1 ]
Urban, Bruce A. [1 ]
Curry, Charlene A. [1 ]
Lane, Judith L. [1 ]
Jennings, Robert S. [1 ]
McCulloch, Colin C. [2 ]
Hsieh, Jiang [3 ]
Londt, John H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Fairfax Radiol Consultants PC, Fairfax, VA 22031 USA
[2] GE Global Res Ctr, Appl Stat Lab, Niskayuna, NY USA
[3] GE Hlthcare Technol, Appl Sci Lab, Waukesha, WI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2463070989
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively compare image quality, radiation dose, and blood vessel assessability for coronary artery computed tomographic (CT) angiograms obtained with a prospectively gated transverse (PGT) CT technique and a retrospectively gated helical (RGH) CT technique, Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant Study received a waiver for approval From the institutional review board, including one for, informed consent. Coronary CT angiograms obtained with 64-detector row CT wet retrospectively evaluated in 203 clinical patients. A routine RGH technique was evaluated in 82 consecutive patients (44 males, 38 females; mean age, 55.6 years). The PGT technique was then evaluated in 121 additional patients (71 males, 50 females; mean age, 56.7 years). All images were evaluated for image quality, estimated radiation dose, and coronary artery segment assessability. Differences in image quality score were evaluated by using a proportional odds logistic regression model, with main effects for three readers, two techniques, and four arteries. Results: The mean effective dose for the group with the PUF technique was 2.8 mSv; this represents an 83% reduction as compared with that for the group with the RGH technique (mean, 18.4 mSv; P < .001). The image quality score for each of the arteries, as well as the overall combined score, was significantly greater for images obtained with PGT technique than for images obtained with RGH technique. The combined mean image quality score was 4.791 for images obtained with PGT technique versus 4.514 for images obtained with RGH technique (proportional odds model odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.7, 4.8). The percentage of assessable coronary artery segments images obtained with PGT was 98.6% (1196 of 1213) for images obtained with PGT technique versus 97.9% (1741 of 1778) for images obtained RGH technique (P = .83). Conclusion: PGT coronary CT angiography offers improved image quality and substantially reduced effective radiation dose compared with traditional RGH coronary CT angiography.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 753
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   MDCT of the coronary arteries: Feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose [J].
Abada, Hicham T. ;
Larchez, Christophe ;
Daoud, Beatrice ;
Sigal-Cinqualbre, Anne ;
Paul, Jean-Francois .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (06) :S387-S390
[2]   Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Ropers, D ;
Hofmann, U ;
MacNeill, B ;
Baum, U ;
Pohle, K ;
Brady, TJ ;
Pomerantsev, E ;
Ludwig, J ;
Flachskampf, FA ;
Wicky, S ;
Jang, IK ;
Daniel, WG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) :842-847
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Categorical data analysis
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IMPL SURG ACR RES CE
[7]  
Austen W G, 1975, Circulation, V51, P5
[8]   Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures [J].
Betsou, S ;
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Katritsis, D ;
Faulkner, K ;
Panayiotakis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :634-639
[9]   The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England [J].
Broadhead, DA ;
Chapple, CL ;
Faulkner, K ;
Davies, ML ;
McCallum, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) :492-497
[10]   Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography [J].
Coles, DR ;
Smail, MA ;
Negus, IS ;
Wilde, P ;
Oberhoff, M ;
Karsch, KR ;
Baumbach, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (09) :1840-1845