Quality of Government and the Returns of Investment: Examining the Impact of Cohesion Expenditure in European Regions

被引:231
作者
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres [1 ]
Garcilazo, Enrique [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, Dept Geog & Environm, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Directorate Publ Governance & Terr Dev OECD GOV, Reg Dev Policy Div, F-75775 Paris 16, France
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Quality of government; Investments; Regional development and growth; Regions; European Union; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; INSTITUTIONS; POLICY; DIFFERENCE; UNION; TOO;
D O I
10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Rodriguez-Pose A. and Garcilazo E. Quality of government and the returns of investment: examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions, Regional Studies. This paper sets out to examine the relationship between the quality of local and regional governments and regional economic performance, linking government quality to the returns of European Union Structural and Cohesion Funds. Using primary data on government quality collected by the Quality of Government Institute, combined with World Bank Global Governance Indicators data, a two-way fixed effect panel regression model is conducted for a total of 169 European regions during the period 1996-2007. The results of the analysis underline the importance of government quality both as a direct determinant of economic growth as well as a moderator of the efficiency of Structural and Cohesion Funds expenditure. The analysis finds that both European Union investments targeting regions and quality of government simultaneously make a difference for regional economic growth, but that above a threshold of cohesion expenditure - calculated at more than Euro120 of cohesion expenditure per capita per year - government quality improvements are a far more important and realistic option for regional development than additional public investment. In many of the regions receiving the bulk of Structural Funds, further improvements in economic growth would require massive amounts of additional investment, unless the quality of government is significantly enhanced.
引用
收藏
页码:1274 / 1290
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
    Acemoglu, D
    Johnson, S
    Robinson, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) : 1369 - 1401
  • [2] Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
  • [3] An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development
    Amin, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 23 (02) : 365 - 378
  • [4] Amin A., 1994, GLOBALIZATION I REGI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, Making Democracy Work: s. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7-8R7
  • [6] THE CASE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION: PLACE-BASED VERSUS PLACE-NEUTRAL APPROACHES
    Barca, Fabrizio
    McCann, Philip
    Rodriguez-Pose, Andres
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (01) : 134 - 152
  • [7] Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy
    Becker, Sascha O.
    Egger, Peter H.
    von Ehrlich, Maximilian
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (04) : 648 - 668
  • [8] The effectiveness of structural policy in the European Union: An empirical analysis for the EU-15 in 1995-2001
    Beugelsdijk, M
    Eijffinger, SCW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2005, 43 (01): : 37 - 51
  • [9] Differences in social capital between 54 Western European regions
    Beugelsdijk, S
    Van Schaik, T
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (08) : 1053 - 1064
  • [10] Beugelsdijk S., 2005, European Journal of Political Economy, V21, P301, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2004.07.004, 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.07.004]