Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5

被引:46
作者
Prapas, Y [1 ]
Prapas, N
Hatziparasidou, A
Vanderzwalmen, P
Nijs, M
Prapa, S
Vlassis, G
机构
[1] Iakentro Fertil Ctr, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotelian Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol 4, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Van Helmont Hosp, SIMAF, Vilvoorde, Belgium
关键词
embryo transfer; ultrasound-guided embryo transfer; IVF; uterine receptivity; window of implantation;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/16.9.1904
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer has been reported to affect success rates in some centres but not others. In a prospective study, we examined the influence of ultrasound guidance in embryo transfer performed on different days after oocyte retrieval. METHODS: Two different methods of embryo transfer were evaluated in 1069 consecutive transfers. The ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was used in 433 cases, whereas 636 embryo transfers were performed with the tactile assessment ('clinical feel') method. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer yielded a higher overall pregnancy rate than the 'clinical feel' approach, 47 versus 36% (P < 0.001). This difference was statistically significant where embryos were transferred after 3 or 4 days of culture, 45.9 versus 37.1% (P = 0.001) and 42.3 versus 27% (P = 0.035) respectively but not significant (P = 0.112) on day 5 embryo transfer (56.3 versus 45.7%). Likewise, the implantation rate was significantly different between the two groups on day 3 and 4 embryo transfer, 23.3 versus 15.8% (P < 0.01) and 21.6 versus 15.7% (P < 0.05%) respectively but no statistical difference was noted on day 5 embryo transfer, 26.7 versus 23.6%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound assistance in embryo transfer on day 3 and 4 significantly improved pregnancy rates in IVF but had no impact on day 5.
引用
收藏
页码:1904 / 1908
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   TRANSFER OF EMBRYOS INTO THE UTERUS - HOW MUCH DO TECHNICAL FACTORS AFFECT PREGNANCY RATES [J].
ALSHAWAF, T ;
DAVE, R ;
HARPER, J ;
LINEHAN, D ;
RILEY, P ;
CRAFT, I .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1993, 10 (01) :31-36
[2]   MODIFICATION OF ENDOMETRIAL CELL BIOLOGY USING PROGESTERONE ANTAGONISTS TO MANIPULATE THE IMPLANTATION WINDOW [J].
BEIER, HM ;
HEGELEHARTUNG, C ;
MOOTZ, U ;
BEIERHELLWIG, K .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1994, 9 :98-115
[3]  
BOLTON VN, 1994, REPROD BIOL, P107
[4]   Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization [J].
Coroleu, B ;
Carreras, O ;
Veiga, A ;
Martell, A ;
Martinez, F ;
Belil, I ;
Hereter, L ;
Barri, PN .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (03) :616-620
[5]   TEMPORAL ASPECT OF UTERINE SENSITIVITY IN PSEUDOPREGNANT OR PREGNANT RAT [J].
DEFEO, VJ .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1963, 72 (02) :305-&
[6]  
DENKER HW, 1994, REPROD BIOL, P17
[7]  
DIEDRICH K, 1989, Human Reproduction (Oxford), V4, P111
[8]  
ENGLERT Y, 1986, Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, V3, P243, DOI 10.1007/BF01132811
[9]   Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization [J].
Fanchin, R ;
Righini, C ;
Olivennes, F ;
Taylor, S ;
de Ziegler, D ;
Frydman, R .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (07) :1968-1974
[10]   A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization [J].
Gardner, DK ;
Schoolcraft, WB ;
Wagley, L ;
Schlenker, T ;
Stevens, J ;
Hesla, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (12) :3434-3440