Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: Historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature

被引:94
作者
Artico, M
Ferrante, L
Pastore, FS
Ramundo, EO
Cantarelli, D
Scopelliti, D
Iannetti, G
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Pharmacol Nat Mol & Gen Physiol, Sect Human Anat, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med 2, Div Neurosurg, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med 1, Chair Maxillo Facial Surg, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] ASL RME, Div Maxillo Facial Surg, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Sch Med, Div Neurosurg, Rome, Italy
来源
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY | 2003年 / 60卷 / 01期
关键词
autologous bone; cranial bone grafts; cranioplasty; skull defect;
D O I
10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00031-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Although the use of autologous bone for reconstruction of the cranial and facial skeleton underwent a partial reappraisal following the introduction of a vast range of alloplastic materials for this purpose, it has demonstrated definite advantages over the last century and, particularly, during the last decade. METHODS Fifteen patients underwent cranial and/or cranio-facial reconstruction using autologous bone grafting in the Department of Neurologic Sciences-Neurosurgery and the Division of Maxillo-Facial Surgery of the Rome "La Sapienza" University between 1987 and 1995. This group of patients consisted of 8 females and 7 males whose average age was 29.5 years (range 7.5 to 59 years, mean age 30). In all these patients cranioplasty and/or cranio-facial reconstruction had been performed to repair bone defects secondary to benign tumors or tumor-like lesions (12 cases), trauma (2 cases), or, in the remaining case, to wound infection after craniotomy for a neurosurgical operation. RESULTS The results obtained in a series of 15 patients treated using this method are described with reference to the abundant data published on this topic. CONCLUSION The mechanical, immunologic, and technical-grafting properties of autologous bone, together with its superior esthetic and psychological effects, probably make it the best material for cranioplasty. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 85 条
[2]
HISTOPATHOLOGIC AND MICRODENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CRANIOTOMY BONE FLAPS PRESERVED BETWEEN ABDOMINAL FAT AND MUSCLE [J].
ACIKGOZ, B ;
OZCAN, OE ;
ERBENGI, A ;
BERTAN, V ;
RUACAN, S ;
ACIKGOZ, HG .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1986, 26 (06) :557-561
[3]
AMSTUTZ HC, 1984, W J MED, V141, P171
[4]
BONE AUTOGRAFTING OF THE CRANIOFACIAL SKELETON - CLINICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
ARDEN, RL ;
BURGIO, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1992, 13 (06) :328-341
[5]
Osteogenesis with coral is increased by BMP and BMC in a rat cranioplasty [J].
Arnaud, E ;
De Pollak, C ;
Meunier, A ;
Sedel, L ;
Damien, C ;
Petite, H .
BIOMATERIALS, 1999, 20 (20) :1909-1918
[6]
Advances in cranioplasty with osteoinductive biomaterials: summary of experimental studies and clinical prospects [J].
Arnaud, E .
CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2000, 16 (10-11) :659-668
[7]
Asano Y, 1993, No To Shinkei, V45, P1145
[8]
AXHAUSEN G, 1907, DTSCH Z CHIR, V91, P388
[9]
BACKDAHL EO, 1966, 10 M SOC SCAND CHIR
[10]
Ballin M., 1921, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V33, P79