Improved scoring system to assess adult donors for cadaver renal transplantation

被引:163
作者
Nyberg, SL [1 ]
Matas, AJ
Kremers, WK
Thostenson, JD
Larson, TS
Prieto, M
Ishitani, MB
Sterioff, S
Stegall, MD
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Transplantat Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Nephrol & Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Div Transplantat, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
graft survival; marginal donor; organ allocation; renal function;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00111.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We previously proposed a quantitative approach to assess donor organs for cadaver renal transplantation. To improve on our original scoring system, we studied 34324 patients who received cadaver renal transplants from adult donors between 1994 and 1999 and were reported to the UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry. A scoring system was developed from five donor variables (age, 0-25 points; history of hypertension, 0-4; creatinine clearance before procurement, 0-4; cause of death, 0-3; HLA mismatch, 0-3) that showed a significant correlation with renal function and long-term graft survival. Cadaver kidneys were stratified by cumulative donor score: grade A, 0-9 points; grade B, 10-19; grade C, 20-29; and grade D, 30-39. The influence of donor score on renal function and graft survival was most severe above 20 points, designated 'marginal' kidneys. In summary, a donor scoring system developed from a large population database was useful in predicting outcome after cadaver renal transplantation. The improved system provides a quantitative approach to evaluation of marginal kidneys and may improve allocation of these organs in cadaver renal transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 721
页数:7
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[2]  
HARPER AM, 1998, CLIN TRANS, P61
[3]   Transplant kidneys sooner: Discard fewer kidneys [J].
Matas, AJ ;
Delmonico, FL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 1 (04) :301-304
[4]   Donor scoring system for cadaveric renal transplantation [J].
Nyberg, SL ;
Matas, AJ ;
Rogers, M ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Velosa, JA ;
Larson, TS ;
Prieto, M ;
Ishitani, MB ;
Sterioff, S ;
Stegall, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 1 (02) :162-170
[5]  
Ojo AO, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P589, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V123589
[6]   Is HLA matching worth the effort? [J].
Opelz, G ;
Wujciak, T ;
Döhler, B .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) :717-720
[7]   Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: Correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction [J].
Randhawa, PS ;
Minervini, AI ;
Lombardero, M ;
Duquesnoy, R ;
Fung, J ;
Shapiro, R ;
Jordan, M ;
Vivas, C ;
Scantlebury, V ;
Demetris, A .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (07) :1352-1357
[8]   The economic implications of HLA matching in cadaveric renal transplantation [J].
Schnitzler, MA ;
Hollenbeak, CS ;
Cohen, DS ;
Woodward, RS ;
Lowell, JA ;
Singer, GG ;
Tesi, RJ ;
Howard, TK ;
Mohanakumar, T ;
Brennan, DC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (19) :1440-1446