Current concepts of Down syndrome screening tests in assisted reproduction twin pregnancies: another double trouble

被引:13
作者
Maymon, R [1 ]
Neeman, O
Shulman, A
Rosen, H
Herman, A
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zerifin, Israel
[2] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
prenatal screening; assisted conception; Down syndrome screening; twin pregnancies;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1259
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have increased both the number of pregnancies in women beyond the age of 35 and the incidence of multiple pregnancies. Various methods of screening for Down syndrome (DS) were introduced in clinical practice during the last two decades, and specific problems were encountered when they were applied for twin pregnancies. The current review aims to explore the problematic issue of prenatal DS screening in ART twins. Overall, more women with twin pregnancies (mainly those who conceived via assisted reproduction) are found to be false positive for DS. This is because mid-trimester maternal serum screening is associated with a higher false-positive rate secondary to changes in the feto-placental endocrinologic metabolism, reflected mainly in high human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels in the ART pregnancies. First-trimester nuchal translucency (NT) measurement in twin pregnancies is not affected by the problems encountered in serum screening. This sonographic screening approach enables a fetus-specific identification of those fetuses at high risk of DS and is associated with a lower false-positive rate than mid-trimester serum screening. DS screening in ART twins presents several challenges in determining the most appropriate screening test modality. Whether there is any significant benefit of adding first-trimester biochemistry or nasal bone scanning in screening ART-conceived twins awaits further investigation. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 750
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Baldwin, 1994, PATHOLOGY MULTIPLE P, P169, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-9514-0_7
[2]   RECENT TRENDS IN THE INCIDENCE OF MULTIPLE BIRTHS AND ASSOCIATED MORTALITY [J].
BOTTING, BJ ;
DAVIES, IM ;
MACFARLANE, AJ .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1987, 62 (09) :941-950
[3]   Down's syndrome screening in twins [J].
Cuckle, H .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1998, 5 (01) :3-4
[4]  
Cuckle H, 1998, SEMIN NEONATOL, V3, P1
[5]  
CUCKLE H, 2001, DS NEWS, V8, P5
[6]   CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS IN TWINS IN ENGLAND AND WALES [J].
DOYLE, PE ;
BERAL, V ;
BOTTING, B ;
WALE, CJ .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1991, 45 (01) :43-48
[7]   Annual summary of vital statistics - 1997 [J].
Guyer, B ;
MacDorman, MF ;
Martin, JA ;
Peters, KD ;
Strobino, DM .
PEDIATRICS, 1998, 102 (06) :1333-1349
[8]   A cohort study of pregnancy outcome after amniocentesis in twin pregnancy [J].
Kidd, SA ;
Lancaster, PAL ;
Anderson, JC ;
Boogert, A ;
Fisher, CC ;
Robertson, R ;
Wass, DM .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 11 (02) :200-213
[9]   Nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome after assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins [J].
Maymon, R ;
Jauniaux, E ;
Holmes, A ;
Wiener, YM ;
Dreazen, E ;
Herman, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (09) :1999-2004
[10]  
Maymon R, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P727, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199908)19:8<727::AID-PD631>3.0.CO