The validity of male patients' self reports regarding prostate cancer screening

被引:66
作者
Jordan, TR
Price, JH
King, KA
Masyk, T
Bedell, AW
机构
[1] Mercy Hlth Care Ctr, Toledo, OH 43624 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Hlth Promot & Human Performance, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Mercy Hlth Syst No Reg, Mercy Family Practice Residency Program, Toledo, OH USA
[4] Mercy Hlth Syst No Reg, Mercy Hlth Partners Family Practice Residency Pro, Toledo, OH USA
关键词
prostate cancer screening; self-report; validity;
D O I
10.1006/pmed.1998.0430
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Despite the high rate of prostate cancer screening, the accuracy of male patients' self-reports of screening has not been investigated. This study assessed the concordance between patients' self-reports of prostate screening and the medical record. Methods. Focus groups were conducted to obtain male patients' perceptions of prostate cancer screening and salient terminology. A sample of males (n = 276), 40 years of age or older, completed a 15-item questionnaire. Patients' self-reports of PSA and DRE screening were then compared with medical records. Results. Results showed that patients' self-reports of DRE and PSA were discordant with the medical record 32 and 29% of the time, respectively. Sensitivity of patients' self-reports for DRE and PSA was 82 and 74%, respectively. Specificity of patients' self-reports for DRE and PSA was 56 and 65%, respectively. One in five patients reported that they were not sure how a doctor checks a man's prostate gland. Only 39% of patients knew that the prostate gland can be checked by a blood test. Conclusions. There were significant differences between patients' self-reports and the medical record. The results should be of concern to primary care practitioners and to those who evaluate the efficacy of prostate cancer screening programs. (C)1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 303
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 1998
  • [2] BOWMAN JA, 1991, HEALTH SERV RES, V26, P97
  • [3] BOWNAN JA, 1997, SOC SCI MED, V44, P969
  • [4] MEASURING THE USE OF MAMMOGRAPHY - 2 METHODS COMPARED
    DEGNAN, D
    HARRIS, R
    RANNEY, J
    QUADE, D
    EARP, JA
    GONZALEZ, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (10) : 1386 - 1388
  • [5] THE USE OF MAMMOGRAPHY VANS BY LOW-INCOME WOMEN - THE ACCURACY OF SELF-REPORTS
    ETZI, S
    LANE, DS
    GRIMSON, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (01) : 107 - 109
  • [6] FLEISS JL, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P378, DOI 10.1037/h0031619
  • [7] CONCORDANCE OF SELF-REPORTED DATA AND MEDICAL RECORD AUDIT FOR 6 CANCER SCREENING PROCEDURES
    GORDON, NP
    HIATT, RA
    LAMPERT, DI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (07) : 566 - 570
  • [8] Accuracy of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a southwestern Native American tribe
    Johnson, CS
    Archer, J
    CamposOutcalt, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1995, 11 (06) : 360 - 363
  • [9] HOW VALID ARE MAMMOGRAPHY SELF-REPORTS
    KING, ES
    RIMER, BK
    TROCK, B
    BALSHEM, A
    ENGSTROM, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1990, 80 (11) : 1386 - 1388
  • [10] ERRORS IN REPORTING CERVICAL SCREENING AMONG PUBLIC-HEALTH CLINIC PATIENTS
    MICHIELUTTE, R
    DIGNAN, MB
    WELLS, HB
    BAHNSON, J
    SMITH, M
    WOOTEN, R
    HALE, LN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (4-5) : 403 - 408