Evaluating emergency response capacity by fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach

被引:135
作者
Ju, Yanbing [1 ]
Wang, Aihua [2 ]
Liu, Xiaoyue [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
Fuzzy AHP; 2-Tuple fuzzy linguistic approach; Emergency response capacity; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; MODEL; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.061
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Emergency management (EM) is a very important issue with various kinds of emergency events frequently taking place. One of the most important components of EM is to evaluate the emergency response capacity (ERC) of emergency department or emergency alternative. Because of time pressure, lack of experience and data, experts often evaluate the importance and the ratings of qualitative criteria in the form of linguistic variable. This paper presents a hybrid fuzzy method consisting fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach to evaluate emergency response capacity. This study has been done in three stages. In the first stage we present a hierarchy of the evaluation index system for emergency response capacity. In the second stage we use fuzzy AHP to analyze the structure of the emergency response capacity evaluation problem. Using linguistic variables, pairwise comparisons for the evaluation criteria and sub-criteria are made to determine the weights of the criteria and sub-criteria. In the third stage, the ratings of sub-criteria are assessed in linguistic values represented by triangular fuzzy numbers to express the qualitative evaluation of experts' subjective opinions, and the linguistic values are transformed into 2-tuples. Use the 2-tuple linguistic weighted average operator (LWAO) to compute the aggregated ratings of criteria and the overall emergency response capacity (OERC) of the emergency alternative. Finally, we demonstrate the validity and feasibility of the proposed hybrid fuzzy approach by means of comparing the emergency response capacity of three emergency alternatives. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6972 / 6981
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process [J].
Ayag, Z. ;
Ozdemir, R. G. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (01) :368-379
[2]   Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, Niraj .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 35 (04) :417-431
[3]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[4]  
[陈文涛 Chen Wentao], 2010, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal], V20, P166
[5]   Bid/no-bid decision-making - A fuzzy linguistic approach [J].
Lin, Ching-Torng ;
Chen, Ying-Te .
International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22 (07) :585-593
[6]   A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach [J].
Chou, Shuo-Yan ;
Chang, Yao-Hui .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 34 (04) :2241-2253
[7]  
Deng Y.F., 2006, J SAFETY SCI TECHNOL, V2, P10
[8]  
Drahek T. E., 1991, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, P17
[9]   Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a textile firm [J].
Ertugrul, Irfan ;
Tus, Ayseguel .
FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2007, 6 (01) :29-49
[10]  
He SS, 2010, J I DISASTER PREVENT, V12, P13