A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere

被引:178
作者
McMurry, PH
Fink, M
Sakurai, H
Stolzenburg, MR
Mauldin, RL
Smith, J
Eisele, F
Moore, K
Sjostedt, S
Tanner, D
Huey, LG
Nowak, JB
Edgerton, E
Voisin, D
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Mech Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Div Atmospher Chem, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Adv Study Program, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[5] NOAA, Aeron Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[7] Atmospher Res & Anal Inc, Cary, NC 27513 USA
[8] Univ Aix Marseille 1, Lab Chim & Environnement, F-13003 Marseille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005JD005901
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A simple dimensionless parameter, L, is shown to determine whether or not new particle formation can occur in the atmosphere on a given day. The criterion accounts for the probability that clusters, formed by nucleation, will coagulate with preexisting particles before they grow to a detectable size. Data acquired in an intensive atmospheric measurement campaign in Atlanta, Georgia, during August 2002 (ANARChE) were used to test the validity of this criterion. Measurements included aerosol size distributions down to 3 nm, properties and composition of freshly nucleated particles, and concentrations of gases including ammonia and sulfuric acid. Nucleation and subsequent growth of particles at this site were often dominated by sulfuric acid. New particle formation was observed when L was less than similar to 1 but not when L was greater than similar to 1. Furthermore, new particle formation was only observed when sulfuric acid concentrations exceeded 5 x 10(6) cm(-3). The data suggest that there was a positive association between concentrations of particles produced by nucleation and ammonia, but this was not shown definitively. Ammonia mixing ratios during this study were mostly in the 1 to 10 ppbv range.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   The Hohenpeissenberg aerosol formation experiment (HAFEX):: a long-term study including size-resolved aerosol, H2SO4, OH, and monoterpenes measurements [J].
Birmili, W ;
Berresheim, H ;
Plass-Dülmer, C ;
Elste, T ;
Gilge, S ;
Wiedensohler, A ;
Uhrner, U .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 :361-376
[2]   Particle production near marine clouds: Sulfuric acid and predictions from classical binary nucleation [J].
Clarke, AD ;
Kapustin, VN ;
Eisele, FL ;
Weber, RJ ;
McMurry, PH .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1999, 26 (16) :2425-2428
[3]   Particle production in the outflow of a midlatitude storm [J].
Clement, CF ;
Ford, IJ ;
Twohy, CH ;
Weinheimer, A ;
Campos, T .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2002, 107 (D21) :AAC5-1
[4]   Analysis of particle formation bursts observed in Finland [J].
Clement, CF ;
Pirjola, L ;
dal Maso, M ;
Mäkelä, JM ;
Kulmala, M .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2001, 32 (02) :217-236
[5]   SELF-NUCLEATION IN SULFURIC ACID-WATER SYSTEM [J].
DOYLE, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1961, 35 (03) :795-&
[6]   HIGH-PRESSURE CHEMICAL IONIZATION FLOW REACTOR FOR REAL-TIME MASS-SPECTROMETRIC DETECTION OF SULFUR GASES AND UNSATURATED-HYDROCARBONS IN AIR [J].
EISELE, FL ;
BERRESHEIM, H .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 64 (03) :283-288
[7]   Results from an informal intercomparison of ammonia measurement techniques [J].
Fehsenfeld, FC ;
Huey, LG ;
Leibrock, E ;
Dissly, R ;
Williams, E ;
Ryerson, TB ;
Norton, R ;
Sueper, DT ;
Hartsell, B .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2002, 107 (D24)
[8]  
Fuchs N.A., 1971, TOPICS CURRENT AEROS, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-016674-2.50006-6, 10.1016/B978-0-08-016674-2.50006-6]
[9]  
Fuchs N.A., 1964, MECH AEROSOLS
[10]   THE AETHALOMETER - AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE REAL-TIME MEASUREMENT OF OPTICAL-ABSORPTION BY AEROSOL-PARTICLES [J].
HANSEN, ADA ;
ROSEN, H ;
NOVAKOV, T .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 36 (JUN) :191-196