Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison

被引:180
作者
Steblay, N
Dysart, J
Fulero, S
Lindsay, RCL
机构
[1] Augsburg Coll, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] Sinclair Coll, Dept Psychol, Dayton, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1023/A:1012888715007
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Most police lineups use a simultaneous presentation technique in which eyewitnesses view all lineup members at the same time. Lindsay and Wells (R. C. L. Lindsay & G. L. Wells, 1985) devised an alternative procedure, the sequential lineup, in which witnesses view one lineup member at a time and decide whether or not that person is the perpetrator prior to viewing the next lineup member. The present work uses the technique of meta-analysis to compare the accuracy rates of these presentation styles. Twenty-three papers were located (9 published and 14 unpublished), providing 30 tests of the hypothesis and including 4,145 participants. Results showed that identification of perpetrators from target-present lineups occurs at a higher rate from simultaneous than from sequential lineups. However, this difference largely disappears when moderator variables approximating real world conditions are considered. Also, correct rejection rates were significantly higher for sequential than simultaneous lineups and this difference is maintained or increased by greater approximation to real world conditions. Implications of these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 473
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, METAANALYTIC PROCEDU, DOI DOI 10.2307/1175262
[2]  
BELLINGER K, 1999, THESIS QUEENS U
[3]  
BLANK H, 2000, UNPUB INFLUENCE OUTS
[4]   EFFECTS OF THE TYPE OF INCIDENT AND THE NUMBER OF PERPETRATORS ON EYEWITNESS MEMORY [J].
CLIFFORD, BR ;
HOLLIN, CR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (03) :364-370
[5]  
CORBER SK, 1995, IDENTIFICATION PROCE
[6]   IMPROVING THE RELIABILITY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION - LINEUP CONSTRUCTION AND PRESENTATION [J].
CUTLER, BL ;
PENROD, SD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (02) :281-290
[7]  
DORMER G, 1983, THESIS QUEENS U
[8]  
HANNAFORD KM, 1985, THESIS QUEENS U
[9]  
JACOB P, 1994, THESIS QUEENS U
[10]   On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research - A new survey of the experts [J].
Kassin, SM ;
Tubb, VA ;
Hosch, HM ;
Memon, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 56 (05) :405-416