Immunosuppression: evolution in practice and trends, 1993-2003

被引:122
作者
Shapiro, R [1 ]
Young, JB
Milford, EL
Trotter, JF
Bustami, RT
Leichtman, AB
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Ctr Heart, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
antirejection treatment; immunosuppression; induction therapy; maintenance immunosuppression; SRTR; transplantation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00833.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Immunosuppression trends for solid organ transplantation have undergone a perceptible shift over the past decade. This period is of interest because it was during this time that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the variety of medications to allow for alternatives in immunosuppressive management. An organ-by-organ review of SRTR data identifies several important trends. Antibody induction continues to be used for the majority of kidney (70%), simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK, 79%) pancreas after kidney (PAK, 74%), and intestine recipients (74%). It is used for under half of thoracic organ recipients and remains uncommon for liver transplant recipients (20%). The type of antibody preparation utilized has shifted from muromonab-CD3 and horse ATG to rabbit ATG and monoclonal anti-IL-2 receptor antagonists. Calcineurin inhibitors continue to be used for maintenance immunosuppression for most recipients, although there has been a shift from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. A clear transition is apparent in the choice of antimetabolite from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil. Although corticosteroids continue to be used as maintenance immunosuppression for most recipients prior to discharge, there is evidence that efforts of steroid avoidance protocols are having an impact across all organs, as slight decreases in their use have been observed.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 886
页数:13
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Transplant data: sources, collection and research considerations, 2004 [J].
Dickinson, DM ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Levine, GN ;
Li, SQ ;
Welch, JC ;
Webb, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) :850-861
[2]   Steroid-free liver transplantation using rabbit antithymocyte globulin and early tacrolimus monotherapy [J].
Eason, JD ;
Nair, S ;
Cohen, AJ ;
Blazek, JL ;
Loss, GE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) :1396-1399
[3]   Rapamycin: Friend, foe, or misunderstood? [J].
Fung, J ;
Marcos, A .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (05) :469-472
[4]   Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: The Canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin A trial: 1-year follow-up [J].
Greig, P ;
Lilly, L ;
Scudamore, C ;
Erb, S ;
Yoshida, E ;
Kneteman, N ;
Bain, V ;
Ghent, C ;
Marotta, P ;
Grant, D ;
Wall, W ;
Tchervenkov, J ;
Barkun, J ;
Roy, A ;
Marleau, D ;
McAlister, V ;
Peltekian, K .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (06) :587-595
[5]   Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ [J].
Ojo, AO ;
Held, PJ ;
Port, FK ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Leichtman, AB ;
Young, EW ;
Arndorfer, J ;
Christensen, L ;
Merion, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (10) :931-940
[6]   Steroid-free liver transplantation in children [J].
Reding, R ;
Gras, J ;
Sokal, E ;
Otte, JB ;
Davies, HFS .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9401) :2068-2070
[7]   Analytical approaches for transplant research, 2004 [J].
Schaubel, DE ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Murray, S ;
Ashby, VB ;
McCullough, KP ;
Dickinson, DM ;
Hulbert-Shearon, TE ;
Webb, RL ;
Wolfe, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) :950-957
[8]   Controversies in the management of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation [J].
Shiffman, ML ;
Vargas, HE ;
Everson, GT .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (11) :1129-1144
[9]   Liver transplantation using sirolimus and minimal corticosteroids (3-day taper) [J].
Trotter, JF ;
Wachs, M ;
Bak, T ;
Trouillot, T ;
Stolpman, N ;
Everson, GT ;
Kam, I .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 7 (04) :343-351