Fault and Event Tree Analyses for Process Systems Risk Analysis: Uncertainty Handling Formulations

被引:187
作者
Ferdous, Refaul [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [1 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [2 ]
Amyotte, Paul [3 ]
Veitch, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Okanagan Sch Engn, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Proc Engn & Appl Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Event tree analysis (ETA); fault tree analysis (FTA); interdependence; likelihoods; quantitative risk analysis (QRA); uncertainty; FUZZY SET APPROACH; WATER-QUALITY; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01475.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Quantitative risk analysis (QRA) is a systematic approach for evaluating likelihood, consequences, and risk of adverse events. QRA based on event (ETA) and fault tree analyses (FTA) employs two basic assumptions. The first assumption is related to likelihood values of input events, and the second assumption is regarding interdependence among the events (for ETA) or basic events (for FTA). Traditionally, FTA and ETA both use crisp probabilities; however, to deal with uncertainties, the probability distributions of input event likelihoods are assumed. These probability distributions are often hard to come by and even if available, they are subject to incompleteness (partial ignorance) and imprecision. Furthermore, both FTA and ETA assume that events (or basic events) are independent. In practice, these two assumptions are often unrealistic. This article focuses on handling uncertainty in a QRA framework of a process system. Fuzzy set theory and evidence theory are used to describe the uncertainties in the input event likelihoods. A method based on a dependency coefficient is used to express interdependencies of events (or basic events) in ETA and FTA. To demonstrate the approach, two case studies are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 107
页数:22
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Abrahamsson M., 2002, 1024 LUND U DEP FIR
[2]   Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization [J].
Agarwal, H ;
Renaud, JE ;
Preston, EL ;
Padmanabhan, D .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 85 (1-3) :281-294
[3]   Event-tree analysis using binary decision diagrams [J].
Andrews, JD ;
Dunnett, SJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2000, 49 (02) :230-238
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, REL REL SOFTW V7 7
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, REL AV MAINT SAF SOF
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, THESIS LOUGHBOROUGH
[8]  
[Anonymous], PROCESS SAFETY ANAL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Fuzzy Logic With Engineering Applications
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications