Monitoring the evolutionary process of quality: Risk-adjusted charting to track outcomes in intensive care

被引:56
作者
Cook, DA [1 ]
Steiner, SH
Cook, RJ
Farewell, VT
Morton, AP
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Infect Management Serv, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[4] MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2BW, England
关键词
risk adjustment; cumulative sum procedure; Shewhart p chart; control chart; monitoring; outcome; performance; intensive care;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000065273.63224.A8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To present graphical procedures for prospectively monitoring outcomes in the intensive care unit. Design: Observational study: risk-adjusted control chart analysis of a case series. Setting. Tertiary referral adult intensive care unit: Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Patients: A total of 3398 intensive care unit admissions from January 1, 1995, to January 1, 1998. Conclusions. Risk-adjusted process control charting procedures for continuous monitoring of intensive care unit outcomes are proposed as quality management tools. A modified Shewhart p chart and cumulative sum process control chart, using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III model mortality prediction for risk adjustment, are presented. The risk-adjusted p chart summarizes performance at arbitrary intervals and plots observed against predicted mortality rate to detect large changes in risk-adjusted mortality. The risk-adjusted cumulative sum procedure is a likelihood-based scoring method that adjusts for estimated risk of death, accumulating evidence from outcomes of all previous patients. It formally tests the hypothesis of a change in the odds of death. In this application, we detected a decrease from above to predicted risk-adjusted mortality. This was temporally related to increased senior staffing levels and enhanced ongoing multidisciplinary review of practice, quality improvement, and educational activities. Formulas and analyses are provided as appendices.
引用
收藏
页码:1676 / 1682
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Apolone G, 1996, INTENS CARE MED, V22, P1368, DOI 10.1007/BF01709553
[2]   Use and Interpretation of statistical quality control charts [J].
Benneyan, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 10 (01) :69-73
[3]   The use of intensive care information systems alters outcome prediction [J].
Bosman, RJ ;
van Straaten, HMO ;
Zandstra, DF .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (09) :953-958
[4]   Interobserver variability in data collection of the APACHE II score in teaching and community hospitals [J].
Chen, LM ;
Martin, CM ;
Morrison, TL ;
Sibbald, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (09) :1999-2004
[5]   Performance of APACHE III models in an Australian ICU [J].
Cook, DA .
CHEST, 2000, 118 (06) :1732-1738
[6]  
DELEVAL MR, 1994, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V107, P914
[7]   INTERHOSPITAL COMPARISONS OF PATIENT OUTCOME FROM INTENSIVE-CARE - IMPORTANCE OF LEAD-TIME BIAS [J].
DRAGSTED, L ;
JORGENSEN, J ;
JENSEN, NH ;
BONSING, E ;
JACOBSEN, E ;
KNAUS, WA ;
QVIST, J .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1989, 17 (05) :418-422
[8]   EVALUATION OF SEVERITY SCORING SYSTEMS IN ICUS - TRANSLATION, CONVERSION AND DEFINITION AMBIGUITIES AS A SOURCE OF INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY IN APACHE-II, SAPS AND OSF [J].
FERYLEMONNIER, E ;
LANDAIS, P ;
LOIRAT, P ;
KLEINKNECHT, D ;
BRIVET, F .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 21 (04) :356-360
[10]  
KENNETT R, 1998, MODERN IND STAT DESI, P360