Behind the SignsA Global Review of Fish Sustainability Information Schemes

被引:89
作者
Parkes, Graeme [1 ,2 ]
Young, James A. [3 ]
Walmsley, Suzannah F. [2 ]
Abel, Rigmor [4 ]
Harman, Jon [5 ]
Horvat, Peter
Lem, Audun [6 ]
Macfarlane, Alastair [7 ]
Mens, Maarten [8 ]
Nolan, Conor [9 ]
机构
[1] MRAG Amer, St Petersburg, FL 33702 USA
[2] MRAG Ltd, London, England
[3] Univ Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[4] Norwegian Seafood Export Council, Tromso, Norway
[5] Seafish Ind Author, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Food & Agr Org United Nat, Rome, Italy
[7] New Zealand Seafood Ind Council, Wellington, New Zealand
[8] Dutch Fish Prod Board, Rijswijk, Netherlands
[9] Irish Sea Fisheries Board BIM, Dublin, Ireland
来源
REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE | 2010年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
ecolabeling; fisheries; aquaculture; certification; recommendation lists; sustainable fisheries; market-based measures;
D O I
10.1080/10641262.2010.516374
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
This article presents the results of a global review of organizations that provide sustainable fisheries informationincluding ecolabels, recommendation lists, and supermarketsto consumers and supply chain intermediaries. It examined 17 organizations and key supermarkets that communicate on the sustainability of world fisheries and aquaculture products. Certification schemes assess a relatively small number of specific fisheries and indicate sustainability through labels. Recommendation lists cover more species and areas but in less detail. Most schemes showed improving conformance with FAO guidelines for fisheries and aquaculture certification. However, significant variation in fisheries' assessment exists, calling into question the accuracy and precision of information and advice provided. Inconsistent approaches and contradictory advice among certification schemes and recommendation lists potentially increase consumer confusion and reduce their credibility. The review identifies seven critical attributes that schemes must addressscope, accuracy, independence, precision, transparency, standardization, and cost-effectivenessand recommends that certification schemes and recommendation lists enhance their consistency and credibility through compliance with these attributes and FAO guidelines. Fish sustainability information schemes play an important role in securing a sustainable future for the oceans. Uptake of this review's recommendations should reduce consumer confusion and increase confidence in the benefits of sustainable purchasing.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 356
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, STAT WORLD FISH AQ 2
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, C1 TUNA TUNA LIKE SP
  • [3] *FAO, 2008, 4 SESS SUBC AQ COMM
  • [4] FAO, 2005, GUID EC FISH FISH PR
  • [5] *FSIG, 2009, REV FISH SUST INF SC
  • [6] GARDINIER PR, 2004, WORLDFISH CTR STUDIE, V27
  • [7] LANKESTER K, 2008, COMP ON PACK SEAFOOD
  • [8] An evaluation of systems for the integrated assessment of capture fisheries
    Leadbitter, Duncan
    Ward, Trevor J.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2007, 31 (04) : 458 - 469
  • [9] MACFADYEN G, 2007, APFIC REG WORKSH CER
  • [10] MONFORT MC, 2007, ECOLABELLING SCHEMES