Comparative effectiveness of the SNaP™ Wound Care System

被引:12
作者
Hutton, David W. [1 ]
Sheehan, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Sheehan Hlth Management Consulting, New York, NY USA
关键词
Cost and cost analysis; Diabetic foot ulcers; Negative pressure wound therapy; SNaP system; Wound care; VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE; DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; THERAPY; MULTICENTER; DRESSINGS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00775.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
Diabetic lower extremity wounds cause substantial burden to healthcare systems, costing tens of thousands of dollars per episode. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) devices have been shown to be cost-effective at treating these wounds, but the traditional devices use bulky electrical pumps that require a durable medical equipment rental-based procurement process. The Spiracur SNaP (TM) Wound Care System is an ultraportable NPWT system that does not use an electric pump and is fully disposable. It has superior healing compared to standard of care with modern dressings and comparable healing to traditional NPWT devices while giving patients greater mobility and giving clinicians a simpler procurement process. We used a mathematical model to analyse the costs of the SNaP (TM) system and compare them to standard of care and electrically powered NPWT devices. When compared to standard of care, the SNaP (TM) system saves over $9000 per wound treated and more than doubles the number of patients healed. The SNaP system has similar healing time to powered NPWT devices, but saves $2300 in Medicare payments or $2800 for private payers per wound treated. Our analysis shows that the SNaP (TM) system could save substantial treatment costs in addition to allowing patients greater freedom and mobility.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 205
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195108248.001.0001
[2]
[Anonymous], 2009, RED BOOK PHARM FUND
[3]
Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds [J].
Apelqvist, Jan ;
Armstrong, David G. ;
Lavery, Lawrence A. ;
Boulton, Andrew J. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (06) :782-788
[4]
Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Clinical experience [J].
Argenta, LC ;
Morykwas, MJ .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 38 (06) :563-576
[5]
Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Armstrong, DG ;
Lavery, LA .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9498) :1704-1710
[6]
ARMSTRONG DG, 2010, COMP NEGATIVE PRESSU
[7]
Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A multicenter randomized controlled trial [J].
Blume, Peter A. ;
Walters, Jodi ;
Payne, Wyatt ;
Ayala, Jose ;
Lantis, John .
DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (04) :631-636
[8]
The global burden of diabetic foot disease [J].
Boulton, AJM ;
Vileikyte, L ;
Ragnarson-Tennvall, G ;
Apelqvist, J .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9498) :1719-1724
[9]
*CTR MED MED SERV, LCD NEG PRESS WOUND
[10]
Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes