Perioperative interscalene block versus intra-articular injection of local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery

被引:33
作者
Beaudet, Veronique [1 ]
Williams, Stephan R. [1 ]
Tetreault, Patrice [2 ]
Perrault, Michel-Antoine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Hosp Norte Dame, Dept Anesthesiol, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Hosp Norte Dame, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
关键词
shoulder surgery; intra-articular; local anesthetic; interscalene; pain;
D O I
10.1016/j.rapm.2007.10.005
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Up to 70% of patients report moderate to severe pain after shoulder surgery, which can compromise early rehabilitation and functional recuperation. Postoperative shoulder pain control is improved with both interscalene block and intra-articular local anesthetic injection. The present study hypothesized that perioperative interscalene analgesia would offer pain control superior to perioperative intra-articular local anesthetics over the first 24 hours after surgery. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: group IS had interscalene block with catheter installation, while group 1A received intra-articular local anesthetic, also with catheter installation. All patients received 3 local anesthetic injections: 0.25 mL/kg of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 2.5 mu g/mL immediately before and after surgery, and 0.25 mL/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 2.5 mu g/mL 1 hour after the end of surgery, after which the catheters were removed, and no further local anesthetics were administered. Postoperative pain at rest was evaluated in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), 3 hours, 6 hours and 24 hours after surgery. The area under the 24 hour pain over time curve was calculated. Hydromorphone consumption in the PACU and over 24 hours was recorded. Results: Pain scores (IS: 0.4 +/- 2 vs. IA: 4 +/- 3, P < .0001) and opioid consumption (IS: 0.7 mg +/- 1.4 vs. IA: 1.5 mg +/- 1.2, P =.02) were significantly higher in the PACU for group IA. However, neither the mean pain scores over the first day after surgery (IS: 5 +/- 2 vs. IA: 5 +/- 3; P = .4) nor 24-hour opioid consumption (IS: 4.4 mg +/- 2.8 vs. IA: 4.2 mg +/- 2.6; P = .4) were significantly higher in group IA. Conclusions: PACU measurements of immediate postoperative pain and narcotic consumption favor perioperative interscalene analgesia over intra-articular analgesia. This benefit does not translate into lower overall pain for the first 24 hours after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 138
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Analgesic effect of interscalene block using low-dose bupivacaine for outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery [J].
Al-Kaisy, A ;
McGuire, G ;
Chan, VWS ;
Bruin, G ;
Peng, P ;
Miniaci, A ;
Perlas, A .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (05) :469-473
[2]  
ALTMAN DG, 2001, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P429
[3]  
BONICA JJ, 1990, MANAGEMENT PAIN, V1, P461
[4]   Patient-controlled analgesia after major shoulder surgery - Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia [J].
Borgeat, A ;
Schappi, B ;
Biasca, N ;
Gerber, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) :1343-1347
[5]  
Borgeat Alain, 2002, Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, V16, P211, DOI 10.1053/bean.2002.0234
[6]   Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery [J].
Capdevila, X ;
Barthelet, Y ;
Biboulet, P ;
Ryckwaert, Y ;
Rubenovitch, J ;
d'Athis, F .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (01) :8-15
[7]   Analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Subacromial versus interscalene continuous infusion of ropivacaine [J].
Delaunay, L ;
Souron, V ;
Lafosse, L ;
Marret, E ;
Toussaint, B .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (02) :117-122
[8]  
ITFELD BM, 2005, ANESTH ANALG, V100, P1822
[9]   Interscalene brachial plexus block is superior to subacromial bursa block after arthroscopic shoulder surgery [J].
Laurila, PA ;
Löppönen, A ;
Kangas-Saarela, T ;
Flinkkilä, T ;
Salomäki, TE .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 46 (08) :1031-1036
[10]  
Neal JM, 2003, ANESTH ANALG, V96, P982, DOI 10.1213/01.ANE.0000052380.69541.D4