The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke

被引:428
作者
Morris, DM
Uswatte, G
Crago, JE
Cook, EW
Taub, E
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Phys Therapy, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Phys Therapy, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Birmingham VA Med Ctr, Phys Med & Rehabil Serv, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2001年 / 82卷 / 06期
关键词
brain injuries; cerebrovascular accident; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2001.23183
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) for assessing upper extremity motor function in adults with hemiplegia. Design: Interrater and test-retest reliability. Setting: A clinical research laboratory at a university medical center. Patients: A sample of convenience of 24 subjects with chronic hemiplegia (onset > 1yr), showing moderate motor impairment. Intervention: The WMFT includes 15 functional tasks. Performances were timed and rated by using a 6-poinr functional ability scale. The WMFT was administered to subjects twice with a 2-week interval between administrations. All test sessions were videotaped for scoring at a later time by blinded and trained experienced therapists. Main Outcome Measure: Interrater reliability was examined by using intraclass correlation coefficients and internal consistency by using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Interrater reliability was .97 or greater for performance time and .88 or greater for functional ability. Internal consistency for test 1 was .92 for performance time and .92 for functional ability; for test 2, it was .86 for performance time and .92 for functional ability. Test-retest reliability was .90 for performance time and .95 for functional ability. Absolute Scores for subjects were stable over the 2 test administrations. Conclusion: The WMFT is an instrument with high interrater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and adequate stability. (C) 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 755
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMEN
[2]  
Cohen J., 1997, STAT POWER BEHAV SCI
[3]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[4]  
Desrosiers J, 1993, CAN J OCCUP THER, V60, P9, DOI DOI 10.1177/000841749306000104
[5]  
Fleiss JL., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P
[6]  
FUGLMEYER AR, 1980, SCAND J REHABIL MED, P85
[7]  
GRESHAM G, 1995, AHCPR PUBL
[8]  
JEBSEN R H, 1969, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, V50, P311
[9]   The arm motor ability test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living [J].
Kopp, B ;
Kunkel, A ;
Flor, H ;
Platz, T ;
Rose, U ;
Mauritz, KH ;
Gresser, K ;
McCulloch, KL ;
Taub, E .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (06) :615-620
[10]   Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients [J].
Kunkel, A ;
Kopp, B ;
Müller, G ;
Villringer, K ;
Villringer, A ;
Taub, E ;
Flor, H .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (06) :624-628