Theories for kinetics and yields of fluorescence and photochemistry: how, if at all, can different models of antenna organization be distinguished experimentally?

被引:39
作者
Bernhardt, K [1 ]
Trissl, HW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Osnabruck, Fachbereich Biol Chem, Biophys Abt, D-49069 Osnabruck, Germany
来源
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS | 1999年 / 1409卷 / 03期
关键词
annihilation; modelling; fluorescence yield; product yield; photosynthesis; fluorescence induction; pump probe; kinetics;
D O I
10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00149-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The models most commonly used to describe the antenna organization of the photosynthetic membrane are the connected units model and the domain model. The theoretical descriptions of the exciton dynamics according to these models are reviewed with emphasis on a common nomenclature. Based on this nomenclature we compare for the two models the kinetics and yields of photochemistry and fluorescence under non-annihilation and annihilation conditions both under continuous light and under flash excitation. The general case is considered, that all initially open reaction centers become gradually closed and that exciton transfer between photosynthetic units (PSUs) is possible. Then, calculated kinetics and yields depend on the model assumptions made to account for the exciton transfer between PSUs. Here we extend the connected units model to flash excitation including exciton-exciton annihilation, and present a new simple mathematical formalism of the domain model under continuous light and flash excitation without annihilation. Product and fluorescence yields predicted by the connected units model for different degrees of connectivity are compared with those predicted by the domain model using the same sets of rate constants. From these calculations we conclude that it is hardly possible to distinguish experimentally between different models by any current method. If at all, classical fluorescence induction measurements are more suited for assessing the excitonic connectivity between PSUs than ps experiments. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 142
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   TRAPPING, LOSS AND ANNIHILATION OF EXCITATIONS IN A PHOTOSYNTHETIC SYSTEM .2. EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PURPLE BACTERIA RHODOSPIRILLUM-RUBRUM AND RHODOPSEUDOMONAS-CAPSULATA [J].
BAKKER, JGC ;
VANGRONDELLE, R ;
DENHOLLANDER, WTF .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1983, 725 (03) :508-518
[2]   ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS OF PHOTOSYSTEM-I, PHOTOSYSTEM-II, AND THE CYTOCHROME-B6/F COMPLEX FROM GREEN PLANTS AND CYANOBACTERIA [J].
BOEKEMA, EJ ;
BOONSTRA, AF ;
DEKKER, JP ;
ROGNER, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOENERGETICS AND BIOMEMBRANES, 1994, 26 (01) :17-29
[3]   ENERGY-TRANSFER BETWEEN PHOTOSYSTEM-II UNITS IN A CONNECTED PACKAGE MODEL OF THE PHOTOCHEMICAL APPARATUS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS [J].
BUTLER, WL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1980, 77 (08) :4697-4701
[5]   Excited state equilibration in the Photosystem I light-harvesting I complex: P700 is almost isoenergetic with its antenna [J].
Croce, R ;
Zucchelli, G ;
Garlaschi, FM ;
Bassi, R ;
Jennings, RC .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 35 (26) :8572-8579
[6]   Exciton equilibration and Photosystem II exciton dynamics - A fluorescence study on Photosystem II membrane particles of spinach [J].
Dau, H ;
Sauer, K .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS, 1996, 1273 (02) :175-190
[7]  
DAU H, 1994, PHOTOCHEM PHOTOBIOL, V60, P1
[8]   TRAPPING, LOSS AND ANNIHILATION OF EXCITATIONS IN A PHOTOSYNTHETIC SYSTEM .1. THEORETICAL ASPECTS [J].
DENHOLLANDER, WTF ;
BAKKER, JGC ;
VANGRONDELLE, R .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1983, 725 (03) :492-507
[9]   COMPETITION BETWEEN ENERGY TRAPPING AND EXCITON ANNIHILATION IN THE LAKE MODEL OF THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC MEMBRANE OF PURPLE BACTERIA [J].
DEPREZ, J ;
PAILLOTIN, G ;
DOBEK, A ;
LEIBL, W ;
TRISSL, HW ;
BRETON, J .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1990, 1015 (02) :295-303
[10]   PHOTOSYNTHESIS [J].
DUYSENS, LNM .
PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1964, 14 :1-104