Multivariate analysis of neuronal interactions in the generalized partial least squares framework: simulations and empirical studies

被引:50
作者
Lin, FH
McIntosh, AR
Agnew, JA
Eden, GF
Zeffiro, TA
Belliveau, JW
机构
[1] MGH, NMR Ctr, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[2] Harvard MIT, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Charlestown, MA 02446 USA
[3] MIT, MGH, HMS, Athinoula A Martinos Ctr Biomed Imaging, Charlestown, MA 02446 USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Rotman Res Inst Baycrest Ctr, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[5] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Study Learning, Washington, DC 20057 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00333-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Identification of spatiotemporal interactions within/between neuron populations is critical for detection and characterization of large-scale neuronal interactions underlying perception, cognition, and behavior. Univariate analysis has been employed successfully in many neuroimaging studies. However, univariate analysis does not explicitly test for interactions between distributed areas of activity and is not sensitive to distributed responses across the brain. Multivariate analysis can explicitly test for multiple statistical models, including the designed paradigm, and allows for spatial and temporal model detection. Here, we investigate multivariate analysis approaches that take into consideration the 4D (time and space) covariance structure of the data. Principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) are two popular multivariate approaches with distinct mathematical constraints. Common difficulties in using these two different decompositions include the following: classification of the revealed components (task-related signal versus noise), overall signal-to-noise sensitivity, and the relatively low computational efficiency (multivariate analysis requires the entire raw data set and more time for model identification analysis). Using both Monte Carlo simulations and empirical data, we derived and tested the generalized partial least squares (gPLS) framework, which can incorporate both PCA and ICA decompositions with computational efficiency. The gPLS method explicitly incorporates the experimental design to simplify the identification of characteristic spatiotemporal patterns. We performed parametric modeling studies of a blocked-design experiment under various conditions, including background noise distribution, sampling rate, and hemodynamic response delay. We used a randomized grouping approach to manipulate the degrees of freedom of PCA and ICA in gPLS to characterize both paradigm coherent and transient brain responses. Simulation data suggest that in the gPLS framework, PICA mostly outperforms ICA as measured by the receiver operating curves (ROCs) in SNR from 0.01 to 100, the hemodynamic response delays from 0 to 3 TR in fMRI, background noise models of Guassian, sub-Gaussian, and super-Gaussian distributions and the number of observations from 5, 10, to 20 in each block of a six-block experiment. Further, due to selective averaging, the gPLS method performs robustly in low signal-to-noise ratio (<1) experiments. We also tested PCA and ICA using PLS in a simulated event-related fMRI data to show their similar detection. Finally, we tested our gPLS approach on empirical fMRI motor data. Using the randomized grouping method, we are able to identify both transient responses and consistent paradigm/model coherent components in the 10-epoch block design motor fMRI experiment. Overall, studies of synthetic and empirical data suggest that PLS analysis, using PCA decomposition, provides a stable and powerful tool for exploration of fMRI/behavior data. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. M rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 642
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   PROCESSING STRATEGIES FOR TIME-COURSE DATA SETS IN FUNCTIONAL MRI OF THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
BANDETTINI, PA ;
JESMANOWICZ, A ;
WONG, EC ;
HYDE, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (02) :161-173
[2]   AN INFORMATION MAXIMIZATION APPROACH TO BLIND SEPARATION AND BLIND DECONVOLUTION [J].
BELL, AJ ;
SEJNOWSKI, TJ .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (06) :1129-1159
[3]   FUNCTIONAL CEREBRAL IMAGING BY SUSCEPTIBILITY-CONTRAST NMR [J].
BELLIVEAU, JW ;
ROSEN, BR ;
KANTOR, HL ;
RZEDZIAN, RR ;
KENNEDY, DN ;
MCKINSTRY, RC ;
VEVEA, JM ;
COHEN, MS ;
PYKETT, IL ;
BRADY, TJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 14 (03) :538-546
[4]   FUNCTIONAL MAPPING OF THE HUMAN VISUAL-CORTEX BY MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
BELLIVEAU, JW ;
KENNEDY, DN ;
MCKINSTRY, RC ;
BUCHBINDER, BR ;
WEISSKOFF, RM ;
COHEN, MS ;
VEVEA, JM ;
BRADY, TJ ;
ROSEN, BR .
SCIENCE, 1991, 254 (5032) :716-719
[5]   Functional magnetic resonance image analysis of a large-scale neurocognitive network [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
RabeHesketh, S ;
Morris, RG ;
Williams, SCR ;
Gregory, L ;
Gray, JA ;
Brammer, MJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (01) :16-33
[6]   Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear systems methods [J].
Cohen, MS .
NEUROIMAGE, 1997, 6 (02) :93-103
[7]   AN ROC APPROACH FOR EVALUATING FUNCTIONAL BRAIN MR-IMAGING AND POSTPROCESSING PROTOCOLS [J].
CONSTABLE, RT ;
SKUDLARSKI, P ;
GORE, JC .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (01) :57-64
[8]   An empirical comparison of SPM preprocessing parameters to the analysis of fMRI data [J].
Della-Maggiore, V ;
Chan, W ;
Peres-Neto, PR ;
McIntosh, AR .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (01) :19-28
[9]   Is multivariate analysis of PET data more revealing than the univariate approach? Evidence from a study of episodic memory retrieval [J].
Fletcher, PC ;
Dolan, RJ ;
Shallice, T ;
Frith, CD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 3 (03) :209-215
[10]   CHARACTERIZING EVOKED HEMODYNAMICS WITH FMRI [J].
FRISTON, KJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
TURNER, R ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1995, 2 (02) :157-165