Parameter de-correlation and model-identification in hybrid-style terrestrial laser scanner self-calibration

被引:30
作者
Lichti, Derek D. [1 ,2 ]
Chow, Jacky [1 ]
Lahamy, Herve [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Geomat Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Ctr Bioengn Res & Educ, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Laser scanning; Calibration; Error; Modelling; Correlation;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.12.001
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
One of the important systematic error parameters identified in terrestrial laser scanners is the collimation axis error, which models the non-orthogonality between two instrumental axes. The quality of this parameter determined by self-calibration, as measured by its estimated precision and its correlation with the tertiary rotation angle kappa of the scanner exterior orientation, is strongly dependent on instrument architecture. While the quality is generally very high for panoramic-type scanners, it is comparably poor for hybrid-style instruments. Two methods for improving the quality of the collimation axis error in hybrid instrument self-calibration are proposed herein: (1) the inclusion of independent observations of the tertiary rotation angle kappa; and (2) the use of a new collimation axis error model. Five real datasets were captured with two different hybrid-style scanners to test each method's efficacy. While the first method achieves the desired outcome of complete decoupling of the collimation axis error from kappa, it is shown that the high correlation is simply transferred to other model variables. The second method achieves partial parameter de-correlation to acceptable levels. Importantly, it does so without any adverse, secondary correlations and is therefore the method recommended for future use. Finally, systematic error model identification has been greatly aided in previous studies by graphical analyses of self-calibration residuals. This paper presents results showing the architecture dependence of this technique, revealing its limitations for hybrid scanners. (C) 2010 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 326
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], P 2 FIG REG C MARR M
  • [2] BOHM J, 2005, REMOTE SENSING SPA 3, V36, P192
  • [3] CHOW JCK, 2010, FIG C 2010 FAC CHALL, P11
  • [4] Static Calibration and Analysis of the Velodyne HDL-64E S2 for High Accuracy Mobile Scanning
    Glennie, Craig
    Lichti, Derek D.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 2 (06): : 1610 - 1624
  • [5] HANKE K, 2006, REMOTE SENSING SPA 5, V36
  • [6] *LAS SCANN HARDW S, 2010, POINT BEG POB
  • [7] Reflectorless total station self-calibration
    Lichti, D. D.
    Lampard, J.
    [J]. SURVEY REVIEW, 2008, 40 (309) : 244 - 259
  • [8] Propagation of an Unmodeled Additive Constant in Range Sensor Observations
    Lichti, D. D.
    O'Keefe, K.
    Jamtsho, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING, 2010, 136 (03) : 111 - 119
  • [9] LICHTI DD, 2009, REMOTE SENSING SPA 3, V38, P171
  • [10] LICHTI DD, 2007, P 2007 FIG WORK WEEK