Rainfall-runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation

被引:181
作者
Blume, Theresa [1 ]
Zehe, Erwin [1 ]
Bronstert, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Inst Geoecol, Sect Hydrol Climatol, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
来源
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES | 2007年 / 52卷 / 05期
关键词
event-based runoff coefficient; hydrograph separation; baseflow; linear statistical model; rainfall-runoff response; Chile;
D O I
10.1623/hysj.52.5.843
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Event-based runoff coefficients can provide information on watershed response. They are useful for catchment comparison to understand how different landscapes "filter" rainfall into event-based runoff and to explain the observed differences with catchment characteristics and related runoff mechanisms. However, the big drawback of this important parameter is the lack of a standard hydrograph separation method preceding its calculation. Event-based runoff coefficients determined with four well-established separation methods, as well as a newly developed separation method, are compared and PF are shown to differ considerably. This signifies that runoff coefficients reported in the literature often convey less information than required to allow for catchment classification. The new separation technique (constant-k method) is based on the theory of linear storage. Its advantages are that it is theoretically based in determining the end point of an event and that it can also be applied to events with multiple peaks. Furthermore, it is shown that event-based runoff coefficients in combination with simple statistical models improve our understanding of rainfall-runoff response of catchments with sparse data.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 862
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   INTERPRETATION OF RECESSION FLOW [J].
ANDERSON, MG ;
BURT, TP .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1980, 46 (1-2) :89-101
[2]   RECESSION AND BASEFLOW PROBLEM [J].
APPLEBY, FV .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1970, 6 (05) :1398-&
[3]   Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Allen, PM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1999, 35 (02) :411-424
[4]   EFFECT OF BASEFLOW SEPARATION PROCEDURES ON SURFACE RUNOFF MODELS [J].
BATES, BC ;
DAVIES, PK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1988, 103 (3-4) :309-322
[5]   THE ROLE OF SOIL-WATER IN STORMFLOW GENERATION IN A FORESTED HEADWATER CATCHMENT - SYNTHESIS OF NATURAL TRACER AND HYDROMETRIC EVIDENCE [J].
BAZEMORE, DE ;
ESHLEMAN, KN ;
HOLLENBECK, KJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1994, 162 (1-2) :47-75
[6]  
Bergstrom S., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P443
[7]   HELPing FRIENDs in PUBs: charting a course for synergies within international water research programmes in gauged and ungauged basins [J].
Bonell, Mike ;
McDonnell, Jeffrey J. ;
Scatena, F. N. ;
Seibert, Jan ;
Uhlenbrook, Stefan ;
van Lanen, Henny A. J. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2006, 20 (08) :1867-1874
[8]   Hillslope and wetland hydrodynamics in a tussock grassland, South Island, New Zealand [J].
Bowden, WB ;
Fahey, BD ;
Ekanayake, J ;
Murray, DL .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2001, 15 (10) :1707-1730
[9]   The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow [J].
Brown, VA ;
McDonnell, JJ ;
Burns, DA ;
Kendall, C .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 217 (3-4) :171-190
[10]   COMPARATIVE HYDROLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF FORESTED AND CLEARED CATCHMENTS IN SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA [J].
BURCH, GJ ;
BATH, RK ;
MOORE, ID ;
OLOUGHLIN, EM .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1987, 90 (1-2) :19-42