Common consequence conditions in decision making under risk

被引:59
作者
Wu, G [1 ]
Gonzalez, R
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Grad Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
rank-dependent expected utility; prospect theory; common consequence effects; fanning out; fanning in; probability weighting function;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007714509322
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We generalize the Allais common consequence effect by describing three common consequence effect conditions and characterizing their implications for the probability weighting function in rank-dependent expected utility. The three conditions-horizontal, vertical, and diagonal shifts within the probability triangle-are necessary and sufficient for different curvature properties of the probability weighting function. The first two conditions, shifts in probability mass from the lowest to middle outcomes and middle to highest outcomes respectively, are alternative conditions for concavity and convexity of the weighting function. The third condition, decreasing Pratt-Arrow absolute concavity, is consistent with recently proposed weighting functions. The three conditions collectively characterize where indifference curves fan out and where they fan in. The common consequence conditions indicate that for nonlinear weighting functions in the context of rank-dependent expected utility, there must exist a region where indifference curves fan out in one direction and fan in the other direction.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 139
页数:25
相关论文
共 45 条
[2]  
Allais M., 1979, Expected utility hypotheses and the allais paradox contemporary discussions of decisions under uncertainty with allai's rejoinder, P437, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1_17
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECONOMETRICA
[4]   Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles [J].
Birnbaum, MH ;
McIntosh, WR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (01) :91-110
[5]   Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch independence and distribution independence [J].
Birnbaum, MH ;
Chavez, A .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 71 (02) :161-194
[6]  
BUSCHENA D, 1998, 951 MONT STAT U DEP
[7]  
Camerer C., 1995, HDB EXPT EC
[8]  
Camerer C.F., 1989, J. Risk Uncertainty, V2, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00055711, 10.1007/BF00055711]
[9]  
Camerer C. F., 1992, Utility theories: Measurements and applications, P207
[10]   VIOLATIONS OF THE BETWEENNESS AXIOM AND NONLINEARITY IN PROBABILITY [J].
CAMERER, CF ;
HO, TH .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1994, 8 (02) :167-196