The currency and tempo of extinction

被引:52
作者
Regan, HM
Lupia, R
Drinnan, AN
Burgman, MA
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum Nat Hist, Norman, OK 73072 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Geol & Geophys, Norman, OK 73072 USA
关键词
mass extinction; current extinction; mammals; vascular plants; fuzzy sets; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1086/317005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study examines estimates of extinction rates for the current purported biotic crisis and from the fossil record. Studies that compare current and geological extinctions sometimes use metrics that confound different sources of error and reflect different features of extinction processes. The per taxon extinction rate is a standard measure in paleontology that avoids some of the pitfalls of alternative approaches. Extinction rates reported in the conservation literature are rarely accompanied by measures of uncertainty, despite many elements of the calculations being subject to considerable error. We quantify some of the most important sources of uncertainty and carry them through the arithmetic of extinction rate calculations using fuzzy numbers. The results emphasize that estimates of current and future rates rely heavily on assumptions about the tempo of extinction and on extrapolations among taxa. Available data are unlikely to be useful in measuring magnitudes or trends in current extinction rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   The fossil record of North American mammals: Evidence for a Paleocene evolutionary radiation [J].
Alroy, J .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1999, 48 (01) :107-118
[2]  
Alroy J, 1998, BIODIVERSITY DYNAMICS, P232
[3]   Extinction filters and current resilience: The significance of past selection pressures for conservation biology [J].
Balmford, A .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1996, 11 (05) :193-196
[4]  
Briggs J, 1988, RARE THREATENED AUST
[5]  
Briggs JD, 1996, RARE THREATENED AUST
[6]  
EHRLICH PR, 1990, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V35, P5, DOI 10.1016/0378-1127(90)90228-4
[7]  
ERWIN TL, 1991, CONSERV BIOL, V5, P1
[8]  
FERSON S, 1995, BIOL CONSERV, V73, P101, DOI 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00047-8
[9]   What Monte Carlo methods cannot do [J].
Ferson, S .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (04) :990-1007
[10]  
Ferson S., 1999, APPL BIOMATHEMATICS, P184