Sensitivity analysis of ground-level ozone concentration to emission changes in two urban regions of southeast Texas

被引:23
作者
Lin, CJ [1 ]
Ho, TC
Chu, HW
Yang, H
Chandru, S
Krishnarajanagar, N
Chiou, P
Hopper, JR
机构
[1] Lamar Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Beaumont, TX 77710 USA
[2] Lamar Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Beaumont, TX 77710 USA
[3] Lamar Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beaumont, TX 77710 USA
[4] Lamar Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Beaumont, TX 77710 USA
[5] Lamar Univ, Dept Math, Beaumont, TX 77710 USA
关键词
ground-level ozone; sensitivity analysis; emission inventory; air quality modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.09.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Air pollutant emission is one of the predominant factors affecting urban air quality such as ground-level ozone formation. This paper assesses the impact of changing emission inventory scenarios, based on combinations of point, mobile, area/non-road and biogenic sources, on the tropospheric ozone concentration in two southeast Texas urban areas, i.e. Houston-Galveston and Beaumont-Port Arthur, during the rapid ozone formation event (ROFE) on August 25, 2000. The EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system with 1999 national emission inventory (NEI99) estimates and updated SAPRC99 chemical mechanism are used in the sensitivity analysis for twelve different emission scenarios. Based on model results, it is found that the point source emission of NOx and VOC contributes the greatest ozone peak in the ROFE. Removing Texas point sources of VOC and NOx emission from the inventory results in a reduction in peak O-3 concentration by 128 and 70 ppbv in Houston urban area, respectively. Similar but less drastic impact from point source is also observed in the Beaumont-Port Arthur area. The effect on peak ozone concentration due to mobile, area and non-road sources emissions are less significant compared to that of point source emission. Reducing VOC emission appears to be more effective than reducing NOx emission in lowering peak O-3 concentration in the studied region. Although biogenic emission can contribute up to 37 ppbv of peak ozone level over a large area, the affected area is away from the urban region of concern, and should not be the main cause for O-3 non-attainment in the two urban areas. Removing CO emission from mobile sources does not lead to significant reduction (< 1 ppbv) in ozone concentrations. The modeled data also show that the transport of O-3 Precursors from adjacent states can cause a significant ozone plume near Beaumont due to its proximity to the state border based on the conditions during the August 25, 2000 O-3 episode. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 323
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ALLEN D, 2002, ACCELERATED SCI EVAL
[2]   Formal uncertainty analysis of a Lagrangian photochemical air pollution model [J].
Bergin, MS ;
Noblet, GS ;
Petrini, K ;
Dhieux, JR ;
Milford, JB ;
Harley, RA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (07) :1116-1126
[3]   Ozone response to precursor controls: comparison of data analysis methods with the predictions of photochemical air quality simulation models [J].
Blanchard, CL ;
Stoeckenius, T .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (07) :1203-1215
[4]  
Byun D., 1999, Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Mutiscale Air Quality Modeling System
[5]   A DETAILED MECHANISM FOR THE GAS-PHASE ATMOSPHERIC REACTIONS OF ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS [J].
CARTER, WPL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1990, 24 (03) :481-518
[6]   COMPUTER MODELING OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHAMBER MEASUREMENTS OF MAXIMUM INCREMENTAL REACTIVITIES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS [J].
CARTER, WPL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 29 (18) :2513-2527
[7]   Sensitivity of urban ozone formation to chlorine emission estimates [J].
Chang, SY ;
McDonald-Buller, E ;
Kimura, Y ;
Yarwood, G ;
Neece, J ;
Russell, M ;
Tanaka, P ;
Allen, D .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (32) :4991-5003
[8]  
CHENG CJ, 2002, 2002 MOD 3 US WORKSH
[9]   The effects of land use in meteorological modeling: implications for assessment of future air quality scenarios [J].
Civerolo, KL ;
Sistla, G ;
Rao, ST ;
Nowak, DJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (10) :1615-1621
[10]  
Daum P., 2002, ACCELERATED SCI EVAL