Pain after primary inguinal herniorrhaphy: Influence of surgical technique

被引:21
作者
Callesen, T [1 ]
Bech, K [1 ]
Andersen, J [1 ]
Nielsen, R [1 ]
Roikjaer, O [1 ]
Kehlet, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, HS Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Hvidovre, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00316-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pain is an important problem after ambulatory hernia repair. To assess the influence of the surgical technique on postoperative pain, two separate randomized, patient-blinded, controlled trials were performed in men with an indirect inguinal hernia. Study Design: In study A, 48 patients with an internal inguinal ring smaller than 1.5 cm were randomly allocated to either simple extirpation of the hernial sac or extirpation plus annulorrhaphy. In study B, 84 patients with an internal inguinal ring wider than 1.5 cm were randomly allocated to extirpation plus annulorrhaphy or extirpation plus Lichtenstein mesh repair (modified). All operations were performed under unmonitored local anesthesia with standardized perioperative analgesia using methadone and tenoxicam. Pain was scored daily for the first postoperative week and after 4 weeks on a four-point verbal-rank scale (no, light, moderate, or severe pain) during rest, while coughing, and during mobilization (rising to the sitting position). Use of supplementary analgesics (paracetamol) was recorded. Cumulative daily pain scores for the first postoperative week and the number of patients who used supplementary analgesics were the main outcome measures. Results: There were no significant differences in cumulative pain scores or use of supplementary analgesics between the treatment groups in either study. Cumulative pain scores were significantly higher during coughing and mobilization than during rest in both studies. Conclusions: Choice of surgical technique for open repair of a primary indirect inguinal hernia has no influence on postoperative pain. (J Am Coil Surg 1999;188: 355-359. (C) 1999 by the American College of Surgeons).
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 359
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   LOCAL-ANESTHESIA FOR INGUINAL-HERNIA REPAIR STEP-BY-STEP PROCEDURE [J].
AMID, PK ;
SHULMAN, AG ;
LICHTENSTEIN, IL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (06) :735-737
[2]  
Amid PK, 1996, EUR J SURG, V162, P447
[3]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BARKUN, JS ;
WEXLER, MJ ;
HINCHEY, EJ ;
THIBEAULT, D ;
MEAKINS, JL .
SURGERY, 1995, 118 (04) :703-710
[4]   Short-term outcome after mesh or shouldice herniorrhaphy: A randomized, prospective study [J].
Barth, RJ ;
Burchard, KW ;
Tosteson, A ;
Sutton, JE ;
Colacchio, TA ;
Henriques, HF ;
Howard, R ;
Steadman, S .
SURGERY, 1998, 123 (02) :121-126
[5]   Postherniorrhaphy pain [J].
Callesen, T ;
Kehlet, H .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (05) :1219-1230
[6]   The feasibility, safety and cost of infiltration anesthesia for hernia repair [J].
Callesen, T ;
Bech, K ;
Kehlet, H .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (01) :31-35
[7]   An assessment of pain and return to normal activity - Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair [J].
Filipi, CJ ;
GastonJohansson, F ;
McBride, PJ ;
Murayama, K ;
Gerhardt, J ;
Cornet, DA ;
Lund, RJ ;
Hirai, D ;
Graham, R ;
Patil, K ;
Fitzgibbons, R ;
Gaines, RD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (10) :983-986
[8]  
KUX M, 1994, CHIRURG, V65, P59
[9]  
LAWRENCE K, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P981
[10]  
LEIBL B, 1995, CHIRURG, V66, P895