Disturbance of eelgrass Zostera marina by commercial mussel Mytilus edulis harvesting in Maine:: dragging impacts and habitat recovery

被引:78
作者
Neckles, HA
Short, FT
Barker, S
Kopp, BS
机构
[1] USGS Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Augusta, ME 04330 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Lab, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[3] Maine Dept Marine Resources, Boothbay Harbor, ME 04575 USA
关键词
eelgrass; Zostera marina; seagrass; dragging impacts; recovery; patch recruitment; patch expansion;
D O I
10.3354/meps285057
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We studied the effects of commercial harvest of blue mussels Mytilus edulis on eelgrass Zostera marina L. in Maquoit Bay, Maine, USA, at a hierarchy of scales, We used aerial photography, underwater video, and eelgrass population- and shoot-based measurements to quantify dragging impacts within 4 sites that had been disturbed at different times over an approximate 7 yr interval, and to project eelgrass meadow recovery rates. Dragging had disturbed 10% of the eelgrass cover in Maquoit Bay, with dragged sites ranging from 3.4 to 31.8 ha in size. Dragging removed above- and below-ground plant material from the majority of the bottom in the disturbed sites. One year following dragging, eelgrass shoot density, shoot height and total biomass of disturbed sites averaged respectively 2 to 3%, 46 to 61% and < 1% that of the reference sites. Substantial differences in eelgrass biomass persisted between disturbed and reference sites up to 7 yr after dragging. Dragging did not affect physical characteristics of the sediment. The pattern and rate of eelgrass bed recovery depended strongly on initial dragging intensity; areas of relatively light dragging with many remnant eelgrass patches (i.e. patches that were missed by the mussel dredge) showed considerable revegetation in 1 yr. However, by developing recovery trajectories from measurements at sites disturbed in different years, we projected that it would require a mean of 10.6 yr for recovery of eelgrass shoot density within the areas of intense dragging characterizing most of the disturbed sites. A spatial simulation model based on measured rates of lateral patch-expansion (mean 12.5 cm yr(-1)) and new-patch recruitment (mean 0.19 patches m(-2) yr(-1)) yielded a mean bed recovery time of 9 to 11 yr following dragging, depending on initial degree of plant removal. Model simulations suggested that with favorable environmental conditions, eelgrass beds might recover from dragging disturbance in 6 yr; conversely, recovery under conditions less conducive to eelgrass growth could require 20 yr or longer. This study shows that mussel dragging poses a severe threat to eelgrass in this region and that regulations to protect eelgrass from dragging impacts would maintain the integrity of a substantial amount of habitat.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 73
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, ERDAS Field Guide, V5th
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, 17301 BLM
  • [3] Ardizzone G. D., 2000, EFFECTS FISHING NONT, P37
  • [4] *ATL STAT MAR FISH, 1997, ASMFC HAB MAN SER, V3
  • [5] Auster PJ, 1998, AM FISH S S, V22, P150
  • [6] Gap dynamics in a seagrass landscape
    Bell, SS
    Robbins, BD
    Jensen, SL
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 1999, 2 (06) : 493 - 504
  • [7] Benjamin JR., 1970, PROBABILITY STAT DEC
  • [8] Responses of eelgrass Zostera marina seedlings to reduced light
    Bintz, JC
    Nixon, SW
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2001, 223 : 133 - 141
  • [9] Effects of recreational clam harvesting on eelgrass (Zostera marina) and associated infaunal invertebrates:: in situ manipulative experiments
    Boese, BL
    [J]. AQUATIC BOTANY, 2002, 73 (01) : 63 - 74
  • [10] Burdick DM, 2001, GLOBAL SEAGRASS RESEARCH METHODS, P79, DOI 10.1016/B978-044450891-1/50005-0