Determination of the genetic relatedness of fig (Ficus carica L.) accessions using RAPD fingerprint and their agro-morphological characterization

被引:39
作者
Ciarmiello, Loredana F. [1 ]
Piccirillo, Pasquale [1 ]
Carillo, Petronia [2 ]
De Luca, Antonio [1 ]
Woodrow, Pasqualina [2 ]
机构
[1] Consiglio Ric & Sperimentaz Agr, Unita Ric Frutticoltura, Fruit Tree Res Unit, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
[2] Seconda Univ Napoli, Dipartimento Sci & Tecnol Ambientali Biol & Farma, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
Cophenetic correlation; Ficus carica L; Germoplasm; Mantel test; Principal component analysis; Pomological characterization; RAPD; UPGMA; MICROSATELLITE MARKERS; COMMON FIG; DIVERSITY; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.sajb.2014.11.012
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Fig cultivation is widespread in Campania, but its production assumes economic relevance mainly in Cilento-Salerno area, thanks to the production of Fico Bianco del Cilento DOP. According to Convention on Biological Diversity, the conservation and sustainable use of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture are required for sustainable agriculture and food security (CBD, 1992). Following these considerations, a research was carried out to collect and characterize the fig germplasm of "Parco Nazionale del Cilento, Vallo di Diano e Alburni", in order to safeguard genetic resources of this area in relation to the plant breeders' needs and other users. The accessions collected were characterized for bio-agronomical and pomological features. Moreover, a molecular characterization was performed using RAPD molecular markers. Some of the characterized accessions show pomological and organoleptic characteristic of interest for growers, breeders and for food-processing industry. A total of 16 RAPD primers produced 278 reproducible bands of which 220 (79.13%) were polymorphic. Genetic analysis, estimated by the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averaging (UPGMA), revealed the genetic structure and relationships among the local and reference germplasm. Twelve Italian fig ecotypes were characterized by RAPD analysis, showing that this is an efficient method to evaluate the Campania fig tree diversity for ex-situ conservation. (C) 2014 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abou-Ellail M., 2014, World Applied Sciences Journal, V29, P313
[2]   Microsatellite Markers as Reliable Tools for Fig Cultivar Identification [J].
Achtak, Hafid ;
Oukabli, Ahmed ;
Ater, Mohammed ;
Santoni, Sylvain ;
Kjellberg, Finn ;
Khadari, Bouchaib .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2009, 134 (06) :624-631
[3]   Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences [J].
Agarwal, Milee ;
Shrivastava, Neeta ;
Padh, Harish .
PLANT CELL REPORTS, 2008, 27 (04) :617-631
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony
[5]   Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated fig (Ficus carica L.) [J].
Aradhya, Mallikarjuna K. ;
Stover, Ed ;
Velasco, Dianne ;
Koehmstedt, Anne .
GENETICA, 2010, 138 (06) :681-694
[6]   Ex situ conservation of underutilised fruit tree species: establishment of a core collection for Ficus carica L. using microsatellite markers (SSRs) [J].
Balas, F. C. ;
Osuna, M. D. ;
Dominguez, G. ;
Perez-Gragera, F. ;
Lopez-Corrales, M. .
TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2014, 10 (03) :703-710
[7]  
Basheer-salimia R., 2012, J GENETIC ENG BIOTEC, V10, P169, DOI [10.1016/j.jgeb.2012.07.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JGEB.2012.07.001, 10.1016/J.JGEB.2012.07.001]
[8]   BREEDING SYSTEM IN FICUS-CARICA, THE COMMON FIG .1. FLORAL DIVERSITY [J].
BECK, NG ;
LORD, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1988, 75 (12) :1904-1912
[9]   Evaluation of genetic diversity of soybean introductions and North American ancestors using RAPD and SSR markers [J].
Brown-Guedira, GL ;
Thompson, JA ;
Nelson, RL ;
Warburton, ML .
CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (03) :815-823
[10]   Organic vs. traditional potato powder [J].
Carillo, Petronia ;
Cacace, Domenico ;
De Pascale, Stefania ;
Rapacciuolo, Mariateresa ;
Fuggi, Amodio .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2012, 133 (04) :1264-1273