Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in preventing femoral venous catheter-associated pulmonary embolism

被引:9
作者
Cox, CE
Carson, SS
Biddle, AK
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
cost-effectiveness; venous thrombosis; ultrasonography; doppler; critical illness;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.200303-367OC
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Femoral central venous catheter use is complicated by a high risk of deep venous thrombosis despite antithrombotic prophylaxis. Although some have recommended screening for femoral catheter-associated thrombosis to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE), this strategy's economic implications are unclear. Therefore, we used a decision model to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of a Doppler ultrasound-based screening strategy versus no ultrasound in averting thromboembolic complications associated with femoral catheters. The base-case analysis included a hypothetical cohort of 60-year-old medical patients treated for acute respiratory failure. The perspective was that of the health care payor, and the primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life expectancy, PE, and PE-associated deaths. The ultrasound strategy cost $8,688/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, $5,305/PE averted, and $99,286/ PE death averted. The best- and worst-case scenarios, calculated in multiway sensitivity analyses by varying in-hospital mortality, deep venous thrombosis prevalence, and ultrasound accuracy, ranged from $1,170/QALY to $35,342/QALY, respectively. Probablistic analyses, in which variables with uncertain values were varied randomly within their ranges, demonstrated median costs of $12,793/ QALY (interquartile range $8,176/QALY, $20,648/QALY). In summary, ultrasound screening may improve outcomes among the critically ill with femoral venous catheters at acceptable costs and could complement venous thrombosis primary prevention programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1487
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
American Medical Association, 1997, PHYS CURR PROC TERM
[2]  
Angus DC, 2002, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V165, P540
[3]   Deep vein thrombosis and its prevention in critically ill adults [J].
Attia, J ;
Ray, JG ;
Cook, DJ ;
Douketis, J ;
Ginsberg, JS ;
Geerts, WH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (10) :1268-1279
[4]  
BARRITT DW, 1960, LANCET, V1, P1309
[5]   Acute respiratory failure in the United States - Incidence and 31-day survival [J].
Behrendt, CE .
CHEST, 2000, 118 (04) :1100-1105
[6]   Cos of long-term complications of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities: An analysis of a defined patient population in Sweden [J].
Bergqvist, D ;
Jendteg, S ;
Johansen, L ;
Persson, U ;
Odegaard, K .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (06) :454-457
[7]   Cost-effective prevention of pulmonary embolus in high-risk trauma patients [J].
Brasel, KJ ;
Borgstrom, DC ;
Weigelt, JA .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 42 (03) :456-460
[8]   HIGH-RISK OF THE CRITICALLY ILL FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM [J].
CADE, JF .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1982, 10 (07) :448-450
[9]   Venous thromboembolic disease: An observational study in medical-surgical intensive care unit patients [J].
Cook, D ;
Attia, J ;
Weaver, B ;
McDonald, E ;
Meade, M ;
Crowther, M .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2000, 15 (04) :127-132
[10]   Prevention and diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: a Canadian survey [J].
Cook, D ;
McMullin, J ;
Hodder, R ;
Heule, M ;
Pinilla, J ;
Dodek, P ;
Stewart, T .
CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 5 (06) :336-342