Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer

被引:1855
作者
Berry, DA
Cronin, KA
Plevritis, SK
Fryback, DG
Clarke, L
Zelen, M
Mandelblatt, JS
Yakovlev, AY
Habbema, JDF
Feuer, EJ
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Unit 447, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[5] Cornerstone Syst, Lynden, WA USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[8] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[9] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa050518
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: We used modeling techniques to assess the relative and absolute contributions of screening mammography and adjuvant treatment to the reduction in breast-cancer mortality in the United States from 1975 to 2000. METHODS: A consortium of investigators developed seven independent statistical models of breast-cancer incidence and mortality. All seven groups used the same sources to obtain data on the use of screening mammography, adjuvant treatment, and benefits of treatment with respect to the rate of death from breast cancer. RESULTS: The proportion of the total reduction in the rate of death from breast cancer attributed to screening varied in the seven models from 28 to 65 percent (median, 46 percent), with adjuvant treatment contributing the rest. The variability across models in the absolute contribution of screening was larger than it was for treatment, reflecting the greater uncertainty associated with estimating the benefit of screening. CONCLUSIONS: Seven statistical models showed that both screening mammography and treatment have helped reduce the rate of death from breast cancer in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:1784 / 1792
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
  • [2] [Anonymous], CANC INTERVENTION SU
  • [3] Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database
    BallardBarbash, R
    Taplin, SH
    Yankaskas, BC
    Ernster, VL
    Rosenberg, RD
    Carney, PA
    Barlow, WE
    Geller, BM
    Kerlikowske, K
    Edwards, BK
    Lynch, CF
    Urban, N
    Key, CR
    Poplack, SP
    Worden, JK
    Kessler, LG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) : 1001 - 1008
  • [4] Progress in cancer screening over a decade: Results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys
    Breen, N
    Wagener, DK
    Brown, ML
    Davis, WW
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (22) : 1704 - 1713
  • [5] Clarke M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1451
  • [6] Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States
    Cronin, KA
    Yu, BB
    Krapcho, M
    Miglioretti, DL
    Fay, MP
    Izmirlian, G
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    Geller, BM
    Feuer, EJ
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2005, 16 (06) : 701 - 712
  • [7] *EARL BREAST CANC, 2002, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V1
  • [8] The mammography dilemma: A crisis for evidence-based medicine?
    Goodman, SN
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (05) : 363 - 365
  • [9] Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: Practice patterns of community physicians
    Harlan, LC
    Abrams, J
    Warren, JL
    Clegg, L
    Stevens, J
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (07) : 1809 - 1817
  • [10] Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Humphrey, LL
    Helfand, M
    Chan, BKS
    Woolf, SH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (05) : 347 - 360