When is versioning optimal for information goods?

被引:104
作者
Bhargava, Hemant K. [1 ]
Choudhary, Vidyanand [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Grad Sch Management, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Pauul Merage Sch Business, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
versioning; multiproduct monopoly; vertical differentiation; market segmentation; information goods;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1070.0773
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper provides insights about when versioning is an optimal strategy for information goods. Our characterization of this class of goods is that variable costs are invariant with quality, including the special case of zero variable costs. Our analysis assumes a monopoly firm that has an existing product in the market and has an opportunity to segment the market by introducing additional lower-quality versions. We derive a simple decision rule for determining the optimality of versioning based on the solution to a single-product maximization problem. Versioning is optimal when the optimal market share of the lower-quality version, offered alone, is greater than the optimal market share of the high-quality version, offered alone. A firm can profitably employ versioning for an information good if it can design the lower quality in a way that, relative to their valuations for the high-end version, high-type consumers have a lower relative valuation for the lower quality than do low-type consumers. When variable costs increase, a firm that offered only one product version need not consider adding another version. When variable costs decrease, the firm should explore adding a lower-quality version.
引用
收藏
页码:1029 / 1035
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Economics of an information intermediary with aggregation benefits [J].
Bhargava, HK ;
Choudhary, V .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (01) :22-36
[2]   Information goods and vertical differentiation [J].
Bhargava, HK ;
Choudhary, V .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 18 (02) :89-106
[3]   Damaged goods [J].
Deneckere, RJ ;
McAfee, RP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 1996, 5 (02) :149-174
[4]  
GHOSE A, 2005, 0514 NET I NEW YORK
[5]   Pricing and resource allocation in caching services with multiple levels of quality of service [J].
Hosanagar, K ;
Krishnan, R ;
Chuang, J ;
Choudhary, V .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (12) :1844-1859
[6]  
Hoversten M. R., 2001, AIR FORCE LAW R, V50, P253
[7]   Network externalities and market segmentation in a monopoly [J].
Jing, Bing .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2007, 95 (01) :7-13
[8]  
JONES R, 1998, PRODUCT PRICE COMPET
[9]  
KATZ ML, 1985, AM ECON REV, V75, P424
[10]   MONOPOLY WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION [J].
MASKIN, E ;
RILEY, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 15 (02) :171-196