Characteristics of Kodak insight, an F-speed intraoral film

被引:23
作者
Ludlow, JB [1 ]
Platin, E
Mol, A
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Diagnost Sci & Gen Dent Dept, Sch Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Oral Maxillofacial Radiol Grad Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS | 2001年 / 91卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1067/moe.2001.110575
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study reports film speed, contrast, exposure latitude, resolution, and response to processing solution depletion of Kodak Insight intraoral film. Methods. Densitometric curves were generated by using International Standards Organization protocol. Additional curves were generated for Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed Plus, and Insight films developed in progressively depleted processing solutions. Eight observers viewed images of a resolution test tool for maximum resolution assessment. Images of an aluminum step-wedge were reviewed to determine useful exposure latitude. Results. Insight's sensitivity in fresh automatic processor solutions places it in the F-speed group. An average gradient of 1.8 was found with all film types. Insight provided 93% of the useful exposure latitude of Ektaspeed Plus film. Insight maintained contrast in progressively depleted processing solutions. Like Ektaspeed Plus, Insight was able to resolve at least 20 line-pairs per millimeter. Conclusions. Under international Standards Organization conditions, Insight required only 77% of the exposure of Ektaspeed Plus film. Insight film provided stable contrast in depleted processing solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 129
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions [J].
Akdeniz, BG ;
Lomcali, G .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (02) :102-106
[2]  
CURRY TS, 1990, CHRISTENSENS PHYSICS, P19
[3]   RADIOGRAPHIC QUALITY-CONTROL MEASUREMENTS COMPARING D-SPEED FILM, E-SPEED FILM, AND XERORADIOGRAPHY [J].
DIEHL, R ;
GRATT, BM ;
GOULD, RG .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1986, 61 (06) :635-640
[4]   Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films [J].
Farman, TT ;
Farman, AG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (01) :41-45
[5]   A COMPARISON OF EKTASPEED AND ULTRASPEED FILMS USING MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC PROCESSING SOLUTIONS [J].
FLETCHER, JC .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1987, 63 (01) :94-102
[6]   AUTOMATIC PROCESSING - EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND TIME CHANGES ON SENSITOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF ULTRA-SPEED AND EKTASPEED FILMS [J].
HASHIMOTO, K ;
THUNTHY, KH ;
WEINBERG, R .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1991, 71 (01) :120-124
[7]  
International Organization for Standardization, 1991, 57991991E ISO
[8]   EFFICACY OF DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC PRACTICES - OPTIONS FOR IMAGE RECEPTORS, EXAMINATION SELECTION, AND PATIENT SELECTION [J].
KANTOR, ML ;
ZEICHNER, SJ ;
VALACHOVIC, RW ;
REISKIN, AB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 119 (02) :259-268
[9]  
Kogon S, 1985, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V14, P65
[10]   EARLY PIONEERS OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY [J].
LANGLAND, OE ;
LANGLAIS, RP .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1995, 80 (05) :496-511