Multiple unit price promotions and their effects on quantity purchase intentions

被引:66
作者
Manning, Kenneth C. [1 ]
Sprott, David E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Coll Business, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Coll Business, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
price promotions; anchoring effects; grocery pricing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumers often encounter multiple unit price promotions whereby a price reduction is presented as a reduced total price for multiple units of the same item (e.g., an item regularly priced at $1.25 each is promoted as "5 for $5"). In a series of experiments, we find that the positive effect of these promotions on quantity purchase intentions is contingent on the magnitude of the quantity specified in the offer and the rate of product consumption. However, offer effectiveness is not influenced by highlighting single unit prices, the unrestricted nature of these promotions, or aggregate savings. As predicted by the selective accessibility explanation, the effect of multiple unit price promotions on quantity purchase intentions is shown to be mediated by accessing anchor-consistent knowledge. An agenda for further research and the implications of our findings for retail practice are discussed. (c) 2007 New York University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 421
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]  
Blattberg RobertC., 1990, Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies
[3]   THE LIMITS OF ANCHORING [J].
CHAPMAN, GB ;
JOHNSON, EJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 7 (04) :223-242
[4]   Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Johnson, EJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1999, 79 (02) :115-153
[5]   Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: it depends on how you frame it [J].
Darke, PR ;
Chung, CMY .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2005, 81 (01) :35-47
[6]   Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level [J].
Hardesty, DM ;
Bearden, WO .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2003, 79 (01) :17-25
[7]   MEASURES OF ANCHORING IN ESTIMATION TASKS [J].
JACOWITZ, KE ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1995, 21 (11) :1161-1166
[8]   A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings [J].
Krishna, A ;
Briesch, R ;
Lehmann, DR ;
Yuan, H .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2002, 78 (02) :101-118
[9]   Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model [J].
Mussweiler, T ;
Strack, F .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 35 (02) :136-164
[10]   The semantics of anchoring [J].
Mussweiler, T ;
Strack, F .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2001, 86 (02) :234-255