Computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using a data-driven Bayesian belief network

被引:58
作者
Wang, XH [1 ]
Zheng, B [1 ]
Good, WF [1 ]
King, JL [1 ]
Chang, YH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Imaging Res Div, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
Bayesian belief network; breast cancer; computer-assisted diagnosis; classifier; cross-validation; machine learning;
D O I
10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00174-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study investigates a simple Bayesian belief network for the diagnosis of breast cancer, and specifically addresses the question of whether integrating image and non-image based features into a single network can yield better performance than hybrid combinations of independent networks, From a dataset of 419 cases, including 92 malignancies, 13 features relating to mammographic findings, physical examinations and patients' clinical histories, were extracted to build three Bayesian belief networks. The: scenarios tested included a network incorporating: all features and two hybrids which combined the outputs of sub-networks corresponding to the image or non-image features. Average areas (A(z)) under the corresponding ROC curves were used as measures of performance. The network incorporating only image based features performed better (A(z)=0.81) than that using nonimage features (A(z) = 0.71). Both hybrid classifiers yielded better performance (A(z) = 0.85 for averaging and A(z) = 0.87 for logistic regression), but neither hybrid was as accurate as the network incorporating all features (A(z) = 0.89). This preliminary study suggests that, like human observers who concurrently consider different types of information, a single classifier that simultaneously evaluates both image and non-image information can achieve better diagnostic performance than the hybrid combinations considered here. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 126
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
BIRD, RE ;
WALLACE, TW ;
YANKASKAS, BC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :613-617
[2]  
Cook H M, 1989, Am J Physiol Imaging, V4, P16
[3]  
Cooper GF, 1989, APPL STOCH MODEL BUS, V5, P39, DOI DOI 10.1002/ASM.3150050106
[4]  
COOPER GF, 1987, 8727 STANF U MED COM
[5]   READING AND DECISION AIDS FOR IMPROVED ACCURACY AND STANDARDIZATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS [J].
DORSI, CJ ;
GETTY, DJ ;
SWETS, JA ;
PICKETT, RM ;
SELTZER, SE ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :619-622
[6]   A LEISURELY LOOK AT THE BOOTSTRAP, THE JACKKNIFE, AND CROSS-VALIDATION [J].
EFRON, B ;
GONG, G .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1983, 37 (01) :36-48
[7]  
FLOYD CE, 1994, CANCER, V74, P2944, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941201)74:11<2944::AID-CNCR2820741109>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-F
[9]   ENHANCED INTERPRETATION OF DIAGNOSTIC IMAGES [J].
GETTY, DJ ;
PICKETT, RM ;
DORSI, CJ ;
SWETS, JA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 (04) :240-252
[10]  
HADDAWY P, 1994, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P770