The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication

被引:215
作者
Richards, JC
Majumdar, S
Lindsey, DP
Beaupré, GS
Yerby, SA
机构
[1] St Francis Med Technol, Alameda, CA 94501 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Residency Program, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] VA Rehabil R&D Ctr, Palo Alto, CA USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Div Biomech Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis; neurogenic intermittent claudication; spinal canal; neural foramen; biomechanics;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. The spinal canal and neural foramina dimensions of cadaver lumbar spines were quantified during flexion and extension using magnetic resonance imaging before and after placement of an interspinous process implant. Objective. To quantify the effect of the implant on the dimensions of the spinal canal and neural foramina during flexion and extension. Summary of the Background Data. Lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication symptoms are typically exacerbated during extension and relieved during flexion. It is understood that the dimensions of the spinal canal and neural foramen increase in flexion and decrease in extension. The authors hypothesized that an interspinous process implant would significantly prevent narrowing of the canal and foramina in extension and have no significant effect in flexion. Methods. Eight L2 - L5 specimens were positioned to 15 degrees of flexion and 15 degrees of extension using a positioning frame. Each specimen was magnetic resonance imaged with and without an interspinous implant ( X STOP) placed between the L3 - L4 spinous processes. Canal and foramina dimensions were compared between the intact and implanted specimens using a repeated measures analysis of variance with a level of significance of 0.05. Results. In extension, the implant significantly increased the canal area by 18% ( 231 - 273 mm(2)), the sub articular diameter by 50% (2.5 - 3.7 mm), the canal diameter by 10% ( 17.8 - 19.5 mm), the foraminal area by 25% ( 106 - 133 mm(2)), and the foraminal width by 41% (3.4 - 4.8 mm). Conclusions. The results of this study show that the X STOP interspinous process implant prevents narrowing of the spinal canal and foramina in extension.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 749
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Lumbar spinal stenosis:: Conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study [J].
Amundsen, T ;
Weber, H ;
Nordal, HJ ;
Magnaes, B ;
Abdelnoor, M ;
Lilleås, F .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1424-1435
[2]  
ARNOLDI CC, 1976, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P4
[3]   The Maine Lumbar Spine Study .3. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Keller, RB ;
Chapin, AM ;
Patrick, DL ;
Long, JM ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1787-1794
[4]  
BEAMER YB, 1973, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V106, P289
[5]  
BLAU JN, 1961, LANCET, V1, P1081
[6]   NATURAL-HISTORY OF INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION OF CAUDA-EQUINA - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
BLAU, JN ;
LOGUE, V .
BRAIN, 1978, 101 (JUN) :211-222
[7]   INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION FROM COMPRESSION OF CAUDA EQUINA BY NARROWED SPINAL CANAL [J].
BRISH, A ;
LERNER, MA ;
BRAHAM, J .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1964, 21 (03) :207-&
[8]   Elastic stabilization alone or combined with rigid fusion in spinal surgery: a biomechanical study and clinical experience based on 82 cases [J].
Caserta, S ;
La Maida, GA ;
Misaggi, B ;
Peroni, D ;
Pietrabissa, R ;
Raimondi, MT ;
Redaelli, A .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (Suppl 2) :S192-S197
[9]   Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal [J].
Chung, SS ;
Lee, CS ;
Kim, SH ;
Chung, MW ;
Ahn, JM .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (04) :217-223
[10]  
COOKE TDV, 1968, CAN J SURG, V11, P151