How does habitat structure affect activity and use of space among house mice?

被引:49
作者
Jensen, SP
Gray, SJ
Hurst, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Anim Behav Grp, Neston CH64 7TE, S Wirral, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Behav & Ecol Res Grp, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.2003.2184
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
For small mammals that are vulnerable to predation, the protection provided by physical structuring within the habitat is important in determining suitable nest or resting sites but little is known about how different aspects of structure affect use of the habitat more generally. We examined the effects of ground-level structure (open/complex), overhead cover (present/absent) and the distribution of protected nest sites and food (clumped together/scattered) on activity and use of space among house mice, Mus domesticus, in enclosures. Adult pairs were housed in eight habitat types differing in arrangement of nestboxes, bricks and cover sheets, and their location was monitored under infrared light every 0.5 s over 4 h during the dark period. The mice spent much more time within protected nest sites and were more restricted in use of different sites within habitats that had little ground-level structure and no overhead cover. Much wider use was made of structurally complex habitats. Complex ground-level structure had the greatest impact on emergence from protected nest sites and use of space, since mice preferred to stay close to, or on top of, walls and other objects when undisturbed. The influence of overhead cover on normal activity depended on the extent of ground-level structure and origin of the mice, but, when disturbed by an experimenter, mice sheltered under overhead cover or in enclosed nest sites. Preference between nest sites depended on accessibility from under overhead cover and proximity to enclosure walls. We found almost no sex differences in activity or use of space. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 250
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   DENSITY, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, AND NONSOCIAL ENVIRONMENT IN HOUSE-MOUSE POPULATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR REGULATION OF NUMBERS [J].
ANDERSON, PK .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1961, 23 (05) :447-&
[2]   ORIENTATION TO LANDMARKS WITHIN THE PREFERRED HABITAT BY PEROMYSCUS-LEUCOPUS [J].
BARRY, RE ;
FRANCQ, EN .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1980, 61 (02) :292-303
[4]   PREDATION HAZARD AND SEED REMOVAL BY SMALL MAMMALS - MICROHABITAT VERSUS PATCH SCALE EFFECTS [J].
BOWERS, MA ;
DOOLEY, JL .
OECOLOGIA, 1993, 94 (02) :247-254
[5]   VARIATION IN GIVING-UP DENSITIES OF FORAGING CHIPMUNKS (TAMIAS-STRIATUS) AND SQUIRRELS (SCIURUS-CAROLINENSIS) [J].
BOWERS, MA ;
JEFFERSON, JL ;
KUEBLER, MG .
OIKOS, 1993, 66 (02) :229-236
[6]   TESTING VALUES OF CRESTED PORCUPINE HABITATS BY EXPERIMENTAL FOOD PATCHES [J].
BROWN, JS ;
ALKON, PU .
OECOLOGIA, 1990, 83 (04) :512-518
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF OWL PREDATION ON THE FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF HETEROMYID RODENTS [J].
BROWN, JS ;
KOTLER, BP ;
SMITH, RJ ;
WIRTZ, WO .
OECOLOGIA, 1988, 76 (03) :408-415
[8]   PREDATION AND HABITAT SHIFT IN THE HOUSE MOUSE, MUS-DOMESTICUS [J].
DICKMAN, CR .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (01) :313-322
[9]   Microhabitat use of deer mice: Effects of interspecific interaction risks [J].
Falkenberg, JC ;
Clarke, JA .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1998, 79 (02) :558-565
[10]   Competitive behaviour in an island population of house mice, Mus domesticus [J].
Gray, SJ ;
Hurst, JL .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 56 :1291-1299