Bioinformatic analysis of functional differences between the immunoproteasome and the constitutive proteasome

被引:38
作者
Kesmir, C
van Noort, V
de Boer, RJ
Hogeweg, P
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Bioctr DTU, Ctr Biol Sequence Anal, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Nijmegen Ctr Mol Life Sci, Ctr Mol & Biomol Informat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
proteasome; MHC class I epitopes; antigen-processing; presentation; specificity; co-evolution;
D O I
10.1007/s00251-003-0585-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Intracellular proteins are degraded largely by proteasomes. In cells stimulated with gamma interferon , the active proteasome subunits are replaced by 'immuno' subunits that form immunoproteasomes. Phylogenetic analysis of the immunosubunits has revealed that they evolve faster than their constitutive counterparts. This suggests that the immunoproteasome has evolved a function that differs from that of the constitutive proteasome. Accumulating experimental degradation data demonstrate, indeed, that the specificity of the immunoproteasome and the constitutive proteasome differs. However, it has not yet been quantified how different the specificity of two forms of the proteasome are. The main question, which still lacks direct evidence, is whether the immunoproteasome generates more MHC ligands. Here we use bioinformatics tools to quantify these differences and show that the immunoproteasome is a more specific enzyme than the constitutive proteasome. Additionally, we predict the degradation of pathogen proteomes and find that the immunoproteasome generates peptides that are better ligands for MHC binding than peptides generated by the constitutive proteasome. Thus, our analysis provides evidence that the immunoproteasome has co-evolved with the major histocompatibility complex to optimize antigen presentation in vertebrate cells.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 449
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
ALTSCHUL SF, 1990, J MOL BIOL, V215, P403, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999
[2]   Sequence signals for generation of antigenic peptides by the proteasome: Implications for proteasomal cleavage mechanism [J].
Altuvia, Y ;
Margalit, H .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 295 (04) :879-890
[3]   The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000 [J].
Bairoch, A ;
Apweiler, R .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :45-48
[4]   The proteasome:: Paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease [J].
Baumeister, W ;
Walz, J ;
Zühl, F ;
Seemuller, E .
CELL, 1998, 92 (03) :367-380
[5]   Abrogation of CTL epitope processing by single amino acid substitution flanking the C-terminal proteasome cleavage site [J].
Beekman, NJ ;
van Veelen, PA ;
van Hall, T ;
Neisig, A ;
Sijts, A ;
Camps, M ;
Kloetzel, PM ;
Neefjes, JJ ;
Melief, CJ ;
Ossendorp, F .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 164 (04) :1898-1905
[6]  
Benham AM, 1998, J IMMUNOL, V161, P83
[7]   MAPPING ACTIVE SITE OF PAPAIN WITH AID OF PEPTIDE SUBSTRATES AND INHIBITORS [J].
BERGER, A ;
SCHECHTER, I .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1970, 257 (813) :249-+
[8]   Association of immunoproteasomes with the endoplasmic reticulum [J].
Brooks, P ;
Murray, RZ ;
Mason, GGF ;
Hendil, KB ;
Rivett, AJ .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 352 :611-615
[9]   Altered properties of the branched chain amino acid-preferring activity contribute to increased cleavages after branched chain residues by the "immunoproteasome" [J].
Cardozo, C ;
Kohanski, RA .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 273 (27) :16764-16770
[10]   26S proteasomes and immunoproteasomes produce mainly N-extended versions of an antigenic peptide [J].
Cascio, P ;
Hilton, C ;
Kisselev, AF ;
Rock, KL ;
Goldberg, AL .
EMBO JOURNAL, 2001, 20 (10) :2357-2366