In vitro pharmacodynamic modelling simulating free serum concentrations of fluoroquinolones against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

被引:41
作者
Zhanel, GG
Walters, M
Laing, N
Hoban, DJ
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Fac Med, Dept Med Microbiol, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Fac Pharm, Dept Med Microbiol, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Clin Microbiol, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/47.4.435
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to compare bacterial killing and the development of resistant mutants in the presence of respiratory fluoroquinolones and ciprofloxacin. Free (protein unbound) serum concentrations were simulated using peak serum concentrations and AUC(24), achieved after standard oral doses for treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. Respiratory fluoroquinolones reduced the inoculum of isolates of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae below the level of detection in the model at 12 h and did not allow regrowth to occur over 48 h. In contrast, ciprofloxacin had a bacteriostatic (<3 log(10) reduction of the initial inoculum) effect, with rapid regrowth occurring over 48 h. Bacterial regrowth and the development of resistant mutants did not occur with any of the respiratory fluoroquinolones. Rapid regrowth and the development of resistant mutants, with MICs two- to eight-fold higher than the MIC before treatment, occurred with ciprofloxacin. These data suggest that the new respiratory fluoroquinolones with a free AUC(24)/MIC of 35-63 reduce the inoculum of multidrug-resistant S. pneumoniae below the level of detection without regrowth or development of resistance over 48 h. This study also demonstrated the poor activity of ciprofloxacin against S. pneumoniae.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 440
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   New fluoroquinolones: Real and potential roles [J].
Peter Ball .
Current Infectious Disease Reports, 1999, 1 (5) :470-479
[2]   Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: Guidelines for management [J].
Bartlett, JG ;
Breiman, RF ;
Mandell, LA ;
File, TM .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 26 (04) :811-838
[3]  
BARTLETT JG, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1614
[4]  
Bauernfeind A., 1999, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, V43, P77, DOI 10.1093/jac/43.suppl_3.77
[5]  
COOPER B, 1989, AM J MED, V87, P475
[6]   Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among respiratory tract isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in North America:: 1997 results from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program [J].
Doern, GV ;
Pfaller, MA ;
Kugler, K ;
Freeman, J ;
Jones, RN .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 27 (04) :764-770
[7]  
Felmingham D, 1996, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V38, P1
[8]   A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia [J].
File, TM ;
Segreti, J ;
Dunbar, L ;
Player, R ;
Kohler, R ;
Williams, RR ;
Kojak, C ;
Rubin, A .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (09) :1965-1972
[9]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral grepafloxacin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis [J].
Forrest, A ;
Chodosh, S ;
Amantea, MA ;
Collins, DA ;
Schentag, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 40 :45-57
[10]   PHARMACODYNAMICS OF INTRAVENOUS CIPROFLOXACIN IN SERIOUSLY ILL-PATIENTS [J].
FORREST, A ;
NIX, DE ;
BALLOW, CH ;
GOSS, TF ;
BIRMINGHAM, MC ;
SCHENTAG, JJ .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 37 (05) :1073-1081