Participation of children in clinical research - Factors that influence a parent's decision to consent

被引:101
作者
Tait, AR [1 ]
Voepel-Lewis, T [1 ]
Malviya, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Hlth Syst, Dept Anesthesiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200310000-00012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Given the initiatives of the National Institutes of Health and other agencies to include children in research, it is important to understand the factors that influence their participation. This study was designed to identify factors that influence parents' decisions to consent to their child's participation in clinical research. Methods: This survey study consisted of 505 parents who had been approached for permission to allow their child to participate in a clinical anesthesia or surgery study at a large tertiary care children's hospital. Regardless of whether the parents consented to (consenters, n = 411), or declined (nonconsenters, n = 94) their child's participation in a study, they were offered the opportunity to complete a questionnaire eliciting information regarding factors that had influenced their decision. Results: Consenters exhibited less uncertainty in their decision making, were more trusting of the medical system, had greater understanding of the research, and believed that the environment in which consent was sought was less pressured than nonconsenters. Predictors of consent included low perceived risk, degree to which the parent read the consent document, characteristics of the consent document, parental understanding, perceived importance of the study, and perceived benefits. Conclusions: Identification of factors that influence parents' decisions to allow their child to participate in a clinical research study will be important by way of developing strategies to improve the manner in which study information is disclosed and to ensure that parents are truly informed.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 825
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL THEORY IN
[2]  
BEAUCHAMP TL, 1994, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, P326
[3]  
Bunn H, 1996, Can J Nurs Res, V28, P13
[4]   RELIABILITY AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF 3 VISUAL-ANALOG MOOD SCALES [J].
CELLA, DF ;
PERRY, SW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1986, 59 (02) :827-833
[5]   Stability and change in personality assessment: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000 [J].
Costa, PT ;
McCrae, RR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1997, 68 (01) :86-94
[6]   Overview: Innovations in assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory [J].
Costa, PT ;
McCrae, RR .
ASSESSMENT, 2000, 7 (04) :325-327
[7]  
COYNE C, 1995, J CANCER EDUC, V10, P12
[8]   ETHICAL AND CULTURAL DIMENSIONS OF INFORMED CONSENT - A CASE-STUDY AND ANALYSIS [J].
CROSS, AW ;
CHURCHILL, LR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1982, 96 (01) :110-113
[9]   Self-determination is not an appropriate model for understanding parental permission and child assent [J].
Denham, EJ ;
Nelson, RM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (05) :1049-1051
[10]   Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research Factors that influence parturients' decisions to participate [J].
Dorantes, DM ;
Tait, AR ;
Naughton, NN .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (02) :369-373