Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery and delayed contrast-enhanced brain MRI in multiple sclerosis

被引:17
作者
Bagheri, Mohammad Hadi [1 ]
Meshksar, Arash [1 ]
Nabavizadeh, Seyyed Ali [1 ]
Borhani-Haghighi, Afshin [2 ]
Ashjazadeh, Nahid [2 ]
Nikseresht, Alireza R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Imaging Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
brain; multiple sclerosis; magnetic resonance imaging; FLAIR; contrast-enhanced;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. In brain MRI of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, enhancement of the lesions is usually evaluated in early contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI). The objective of this study is to determine the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated-inversion-recovery (CE-FLAIR) and delayed contrast-enhanced MRI in evaluation of MS brain lesions. Materials and Methods. Brain MRI examination including early and delayed CE-T1WI and early and delayed CE-FLAIR images was performed for 46 patients with clinically definite MS disease. Number, size, location, degree, and pattern of enhancement of the enhanced lesions in each sequence were recorded separately. Results. A total number of 87 enhanced lesions was detected in 30 patients. Early CE-T1WI could detect only 63 lesions (72.4% of total) in 24 patients, while delayed CE-T1WI and early and delayed CE-FLAIR images showed 85 (97.7%), 84 (96.6%), and 81 (93.1%) lesions in 28, 28, and 26 patients, respectively. A greater degree of enhancement and larger lesion size were observed in the additional sequences compared with the early CE-T1WI. Conclusions. The sensitivity of early CE-T1WI for the detection of enhanced MS lesions is significantly lower than that for other additional sequences. Delayed CE-FLAIR images could not add significant information to other sequences. Therefore, early CE-FLAIR and delayed CE-T1WI brain MRI can be considered as part of the evaluation of MS patients, especially if, despite clinically suspected active disease, no enhanced lesion is found in the routine CE-T1WI.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions [J].
Bakshi, R ;
Ariyaratana, S ;
Benedict, RHB ;
Jacobs, L .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 58 (05) :742-748
[2]   Multisequence MRI in clinically isolated syndromes and the early development of MS [J].
Brex, PA ;
O'Riordan, JI ;
Miszkiel, KA ;
Moseley, IF ;
Thompson, AJ ;
Plant, GT ;
Miller, DH .
NEUROLOGY, 1999, 53 (06) :1184-1190
[3]  
Ercan N, 2004, AM J NEURORADIOL, V25, P761
[4]   Disappearance of tumor contrast on contrast-enhanced FLAIR imaging of cerebral gliomas [J].
Essig, M ;
Schoenberg, SO ;
Debus, J ;
van Kaick, G .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (05) :513-518
[5]   Cerebral gliomas and metastases: Assessment with contrast-enhanced fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR imaging [J].
Essig, M ;
Knopp, MV ;
Schoenberg, SO ;
Hawighorst, H ;
Wenz, F ;
Debus, J ;
van Kaick, G .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (02) :551-557
[6]   Sensitivity of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI in multiple sclerosis [J].
Filippi, M ;
Yousry, T ;
Rocca, MA ;
Fesl, G ;
Voltz, R ;
Comi, G .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 95 (06) :331-334
[7]   Triple dose of gadolinium-DTPA and delayed MRI in patients with benign multiple sclerosis [J].
Filippi, M ;
Capra, R ;
Campi, A ;
Colombo, B ;
Prandini, F ;
Marciano, N ;
Gasparotti, R ;
Comi, G .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 60 (05) :526-530
[8]  
Ge Y, 2006, AM J NEURORADIOL, V27, P1165
[9]   THE INITIAL DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - CLINICAL IMPACT OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING [J].
GEBARSKI, SS ;
GABRIELSEN, TO ;
GILMAN, S ;
KNAKE, JE ;
LATACK, JT ;
AISEN, AM .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1985, 17 (05) :469-474
[10]   Post-contrast FLAIR MR imaging of the brain in children: normal and abnormal intracranial enhancement [J].
Goo, HW ;
Choi, CG .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 33 (12) :843-849