Pain in scleral pocket incision cataract surgery using topical and peribulbar anesthesia

被引:24
作者
Virtanen, P
Huha, T
机构
[1] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Oulu 90100, Finland
[2] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Oulu 90100, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80351-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the pain produced during different phases of phacoemulsification cataract surgery using a scleral pocket incision under topical versus peribulbar anesthesia. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland. Methods: This prospective study comprised 100 cataract patients who were randomly selected to have phacoemulsification with a scleral pocket incision using either topical or peribulbar anesthesia. Topical anesthesia comprised oxybuprocaine 0.4% drops. Peribulbar anesthesia was given with an inferolateral transconjuctival injection of an even mixture of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with hyaluronidase. Inadvertent eye movement during surgery was recorded. Pain occurring during intravenous line cannulation, introduction of the anesthestic agent, and phacoemulsification was measured using a visual analog scale (from 0 to 10) and a descriptive verbal 5-step scale. Patients were asked about pain immediately after each phase. Results: The pain during cannulation was similar in both groups (P =.498). The peribulbar injection was statistically significantly more painful than induction of topical anesthesia (2.11 and 0.10, respectively; P <.001). Surgery was statistically significantly more painful in the topical group than in the peribulbar group (2.76 and 0.85, respectively; P <.001). The mean pain score during all 3 phases was similar (1.43 topical group and 1.51 peribulbar group; P =.500). On the verbal scale, surgery was more painful under topical than under peribulbar anesthesia (P<.001). There were no statistical differences in pain during the peribulbar injection and during cannulation (P =.461 and P =.462, respectively). Inadvertent eye movement occurred more often in the topical anesthesia group. Conclusion: Considering the entire procedure, total pain using topical anesthesia was acceptable and equal to that using peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification with a scleral pocket incision. Pain during phacoemulsification was greater under topical anesthesia but not significantly different from the pain during the peribulbar injection.
引用
收藏
页码:1609 / 1613
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Topical anaesthesia with oxybuprocaine versus sub-Tenon's infiltration with 2% lignocaine for small incision cataract surgery [J].
Chittenden, HB ;
Meacock, WR ;
Govan, JAA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 81 (04) :288-290
[2]   POSTERIOR PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA - AN ALTERNATIVE TO RETROBULBAR ANESTHESIA [J].
DAVIS, DV ;
MANDEL, MR .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1986, 12 (02) :182-185
[3]  
Dinsmore SC, 1996, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V27, P935
[4]   TOPICAL ANESTHESIA FOR PHACOEMULSIFICATION SURGERY [J].
DUGUID, IGM ;
CLAOUE, CMP ;
THAMBYRAJAH, Y ;
ALLAN, BDS ;
DART, JKG ;
STEELE, ADM .
EYE, 1995, 9 :456-459
[5]   Indicators of patient suitability for topical anesthesia [J].
Fraser, SG ;
Siriwadena, D ;
Jamieson, H ;
Girault, J ;
Bryan, SJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (05) :781-783
[6]   PINPOINT ANESTHESIA - A NEW APPROACH TO LOCAL OCULAR ANESTHESIA [J].
FUKASAKU, H ;
MARRON, JA .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1994, 20 (04) :468-471
[7]  
HAMILTON RC, 1993, OPHTHALMIC ANESTHESI, P187
[9]   Randomised trial of topical versus sub-Tenon's local anaesthesia for small-incision cataract surgery [J].
Manners, TD ;
Burton, RL .
EYE, 1996, 10 :367-370
[10]  
MASKET S, 1996, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V22, P1135