A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services

被引:323
作者
Vigerstol, Kari L. [1 ]
Aukema, Juliann E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
关键词
Hydrology; InVEST; ARIES; SWAT; VIC; Environmental services; Conservation; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HYDROLOGIC IMPACTS; PART; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION; SUPPORT; BASIN; ENSO;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Interest in ecosystem services has grown tremendously among a wide range of sectors, including government agencies, NGO's and the business community. Ecosystem services entailing freshwater (e.g. flood control, the provision of hydropower, and water supply), as well as carbon storage and sequestration, have received the greatest attention in both scientific and on-the-ground applications. Given the newness of the field and the variety of tools for predicting water-based services, it is difficult to know which tools to use for different questions. There are two types of freshwater-related tools - traditional hydrologic tools and newer ecosystem services tools. Here we review two of the most prominent tools of each type and their possible applications. In particular, we compare the data requirements, ease of use, questions addressed, and interpretability of results among the models. We discuss the strengths, challenges and most appropriate applications of the different models. Traditional hydrological tools provide more detail whereas ecosystem services tools tend to be more accessible to non-experts and can provide a good general picture of these ecosystem services. We also suggest gaps in the modeling toolbox that would provide the greatest advances by improving existing tools. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2403 / 2409
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Application of a macroscale hydrologic model to estimate the water balance of the Arkansas Red River basin [J].
Abdulla, FA ;
Lettenmaier, DP ;
Wood, EF ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D3) :7449-7459
[2]   Natural value [J].
不详 .
NATURE, 2009, 457 (7231) :764-764
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECOSYSTEMS WELL BEIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], FUTURE EXPECTATIONS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BETTER ASSESSMENT SC, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-09722-0_18.EARTHINFO,INC.,BOULDER
[6]  
[Anonymous], 11 INT BIOECON C EC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NATURES SERVICES SOC
[9]  
[Anonymous], P TRANSP RES BOARD 2
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ENV PROTECTION AGENC