Effects of conformational distributions on sigma profiles in COSMO theories

被引:28
作者
Wang, S
Stubbs, JM
Siepmann, JI
Sandler, SI [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Chem Engn, Ctr Mol & Engn Thermodynam, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Grinnell Coll, Grinnell, IA 50112 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Chem, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Chem Engn & Mat Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jp053859h
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The charge density or sigma profile of a solute molecule is an essential component in COSMO (conductor-like screen model) based solvation theories, and its generation depends on the molecular conformation used. The usual procedure is to determine the conformation of an isolated molecule, and assume that this is unchanged when the molecule is placed in solution. In this paper, the conformations of 1-hexanol and 2-methoxy-ethanol in both the liquid and vapor phases obtained from Gibbs ensemble simulation and from an isolated-molecule quantum DFT optimization are used to determine the effect of realistic conformation differences on COSMO-based properties predictions. In particular, the vapor pressure at the normal boiling temperature and the binary mixture VLE (vapor-liquid equilibrium) predictions obtained using different conformations are investigated. The results show that the sigma profile for 1-hexanol varies only slightly using the different conformations, while the sigma profile of 2-methoxy-ethanol shows a significant difference between the liquid and vapor phases. Consequently, the vapor pressure predictions for 1-hexanol are similar regardless of the manner in which the conformation population was obtained, while there is a larger difference for 2-methoxy-ethanol depending on whether the liquid or vapor conformations from simulation or the DFT-optimized structure is used. These differences in predictions are seen to be largely due to differences in the ideal solvation energy term. In mixture VLE calculations involving 1-hexanol, we again see that there is little difference in the phase equilibrium predictions among the different conformations, while for the mixture with 2-methoxy-ethanol, the differences in the sigma profiles lead to a more noticeable, though not significant, difference in the phase equilibrium predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:11285 / 11294
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Allen M.P., 2001, COMPUTER SIMULATION, V2nd
[2]   EQUATION OF STATE OF CHAIN MOLECULES [J].
BOUBLIK, T ;
VEGA, C ;
DIAZPENA, M .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 93 (01) :730-736
[3]   Monte Carlo calculations for alcohols and their mixtures with alkanes. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 5. United-atom description of primary, secondary, and tertiary alcohols [J].
Chen, B ;
Potoff, JJ ;
Siepmann, JI .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2001, 105 (15) :3093-3104
[4]   Implicit solvation models: Equilibria, structure, spectra, and dynamics [J].
Cramer, CJ ;
Truhlar, DG .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1999, 99 (08) :2161-2200
[5]   Present status of group-contribution methods for the synthesis and design of chemical processes [J].
Gmehling, J .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 1998, 144 (1-2) :37-47
[6]  
Gmehling J., 1977, VAPOR LIQUID EQUILIB, VI
[7]   QSPR - THE CORRELATION AND QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION OF CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES FROM STRUCTURE [J].
KATRITZKY, AR ;
LOBANOV, VS ;
KARELSON, M .
CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 1995, 24 (04) :279-+
[8]   CONDUCTOR-LIKE SCREENING MODEL FOR REAL SOLVENTS - A NEW APPROACH TO THE QUANTITATIVE CALCULATION OF SOLVATION PHENOMENA [J].
KLAMT, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 99 (07) :2224-2235
[9]   Treatment of the outlying charge in continuum solvation models [J].
Klamt, A ;
Jonas, V .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 105 (22) :9972-9981
[10]   Refinement and parametrization of COSMO-RS [J].
Klamt, A ;
Jonas, V ;
Bürger, T ;
Lohrenz, JCW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1998, 102 (26) :5074-5085