Value and risk assessment of supply chain management improvement projects

被引:23
作者
Brun, A [1 ]
Caridi, M [1 ]
Salama, KF [1 ]
Ravelli, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
value and risk assessment; APS/SCM projects; information systems; key performance indicators;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.12.016
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
in this paper the decisional process of the introduction of a new information system for advanced planning and scheduling and supply chain management (APS/SCM) is discussed, with particular care given to the value assessment stage. In a research programme recently carried out at Politecnico di Milano a new methodology has been developed and tested on a set of test bed cases. The methodology is based on the consideration that activities whose execution can be supported by APS/SCM solutions may have an impact on the key performances of a supply chain. In particular, in the first phase of the value assessment methodology the identification of the information requirements is carried out, thus allowing an estimate of the punctual value generated by the information system solution. The following phase provides a risk analysis of the estimated value. As information systems' implementations have impacts not only on economic value but also on strategic and intangible issues, this needs a deep review of traditional risk analysis approaches. After introducing the issue of value assessment of APS/SCM information systems, a summary of the value assessment methodology developed at Politecnico di Milano will be given. Finally a case study is provided to give more insights on the practical application of the methodology. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 201
页数:16
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Ballantine J. A., 1999, Logistics Information Management, V12, P78, DOI 10.1108/09576059910256286
[2]  
Bowersox D.J., 1996, LOGISTICAL MANAGEMEN
[3]  
FARBEY B, 1993, ASSESS YOUR IT INVES
[4]  
FARBEY B, 2000, EVALUATION SOFTWARE
[5]  
FISHER ML, 1997, WHAT RIGHT SUPPLY CH, P105
[6]   Mixed group validation: A method to address the limitations of criterion group validation in research on malingering detection [J].
Frederick, RI .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2000, 18 (06) :693-718
[7]  
Kahnemann D., 1982, JUDGEMENT UNCERTAINT
[8]  
Orlicky J., 1975, Material Requirements Planning (Primeira ed.)
[9]   Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: A comparative review [J].
Renkema, TJW ;
Berghout, EW .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 39 (01) :1-13
[10]  
SALAMA KF, 2002, THESIS POLITECNICO M