IGF-II promoter methylation and ovarian cancer prognosis

被引:13
作者
Beeghly, A. C.
Katsaros, D.
Wiley, A. L.
de la Longrais, I. A. Rigault
Prescott, A. T.
Chen, H.
Puopolo, M.
Rutherford, T. J.
Yu, H.
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Canc Ctr, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Univ Turin, Turin, Italy
关键词
IGF-II; promoter methylation; ovarian cancer prognosis;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-007-0211-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) gene has four promoters that produce distinct transcripts which vary by tissue type and developmental stage. Dysregulation of normal promoter usage has been shown to occur in cancer; DNA methylation regulates promoter use. Thus, we sought to examine if DNA methylation varies among IGF-II promoters in ovarian cancer and if methylation patterns are related to clinical features of the disease. Study design Tumor tissue, clinical data, and follow-up information were collected from 215 patients diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian cancer. DNA extracted from tumor tissues was analyzed for IGF-II promoter methylation with seven methylation specific PCR (MSP) assays: three for promoter 2 (P2) and two assays each for promoters 3 and 4 (P3 and P4). Results Methylation was found to vary among the seven assays: 19.3% in P2A, 45.6% in P2B, 50.9% in P2C, 48.4% in P3A, 13.1% in P3B, 5.1% in P4A, and 6.1% in P4B. Methylation in any of the three P2 assays was associated with high tumor grade (P = 0.043), suboptimal debulking (P = 0.036), and disease progression [hazards ratio (HR) = 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-2.74]. When comparing promoter methylation patterns, differential methylation of P2 and P3 was found to be associated with disease prognosis; patients with P3 but not P2 methylation were less likely to have disease progression (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.91) compared to patients with P2 but not P3 methylation. Conclusions This study shows that methylation varies among three IGF-II promoters in ovarian cancer and that this variation seems to have biologic implications as it relates to clinical features and prognosis of the disease.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 723
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and ovarian cancer treatment and survival [J].
Beeghly, A ;
Katsaros, D ;
Chen, H ;
Fracchioli, S ;
Zhang, Y ;
Massobrio, M ;
Risch, H ;
Jones, B ;
Yu, H .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (02) :330-337
[2]  
Chen CL, 2000, CLIN CANCER RES, V6, P474
[3]  
Cui HM, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P6442
[4]   INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-I AND FACTOR-II - PEPTIDE, MESSENGER RIBONUCLEIC-ACID AND GENE STRUCTURES, SERUM, AND TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS [J].
DAUGHADAY, WH ;
ROTWEIN, P .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 1989, 10 (01) :68-91
[5]  
DoucRasy S, 1996, ONCOGENE, V12, P423
[6]   Frequent loss of imprinting at the IGF2 and H19 genes in head and neck squamous carcinoma [J].
El-Naggar, AK ;
Lai, SL ;
Tucker, SA ;
Clayman, GL ;
Goepfert, H ;
Hong, WK ;
Huff, V .
ONCOGENE, 1999, 18 (50) :7063-7069
[7]   Transcriptional regulation and biological significance of the insulin like growth factor II gene [J].
Engström, W ;
Shokrai, A ;
Otte, K ;
Granérus, M ;
Gessbo, Å ;
Bierke, P ;
Madej, A ;
Sjölund, M ;
Ward, A .
CELL PROLIFERATION, 1998, 31 (5-6) :173-189
[8]   Methylation changes in the human IGF2 P3 promoter parallel IGF2 expression in the primary tumor, established cell line, and xenograft of a human hepatoblastoma [J].
Eriksson, T ;
Frisk, T ;
Gray, SG ;
von Schweinitz, D ;
Pietsch, T ;
Larsson, C ;
Sandstedt, B ;
Ekström, TJ .
EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 2001, 270 (01) :88-95
[9]  
Esteller M, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P3225
[10]  
*FIGO, 1987, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V156, P263