The CO2 mitigation options for the electric sector - A case study of Taiwan

被引:26
作者
Bai, HL
Wei, JH
机构
[1] Inst. of Environmental Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsin-Chu, 75, Po-Ai Street
关键词
CO2 control strategies; fuel alternatives; CO2 capture technologies;
D O I
10.1016/0301-4215(95)00133-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A linear programming model is presented to evaluate the effectiveness of possible CO2 mitigation options for the electric sector. The options being considered are fuel alternatives, energy conservation, reduced peak production, improved electric efficiency and CO2 capture technologies. The results indicate that energy conservation can significantly reduce CO2 emissions only when combined with reduced peak production and improved electric efficiency. The cost effectiveness of installing CO2 capture and disposal devices was compared to that of fuel alternative plan. It is concluded that the installation of CO2 capture and disposal devices can be an effective and economic option.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION ACHIEVED BY ENERGY-CONSERVATION
    BLOK, K
    WORRELL, E
    CUELENAERE, R
    TURKENBURG, W
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1993, 21 (06) : 656 - 667
  • [2] AN ENGINEERING AND ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF CO2 REMOVAL FROM FOSSIL-FUEL-FIRED POWER-PLANTS
    BOORAS, GS
    SMELSER, SC
    [J]. ENERGY, 1991, 16 (11-12) : 1295 - 1305
  • [3] *EN COMM MIN EC AF, 1992, INT EN STAT
  • [4] *EN COMM MIN EC AF, 1993, TAIW EN STAT
  • [5] COMPARABLE ASSESSMENT OF NATIONAL GHG ABATEMENT COSTS
    HALSNAES, K
    MACKENZIE, GA
    SWISHER, JN
    VILLAVICENCIO, A
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (11) : 925 - 934
  • [6] HERZOG H, 1994, 87 ANN M EXH AIR WAS
  • [7] HUANG JP, 1993, ENERGY, V18, P281
  • [8] *IPCC, 1990, POL MAK SUMM SCI ASS
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF CO2 EMISSIONS FROM FOSSIL AND SOLAR POWER-PLANTS IN THE UNITED-STATES
    KREITH, F
    NORTON, P
    BROWN, D
    [J]. ENERGY, 1990, 15 (12) : 1181 - 1198
  • [10] MAHGARY Y, 1994, ENERG POLICY, V22, P935