On offense history and the theory of deterrence

被引:63
作者
Polinsky, AM [1 ]
Shavell, S
机构
[1] Natl Bur Econ Res, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00009-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article uses a two-period version of the standard economic model of deterrence to study whether sanctions should depend on an individual's record of prior convictions-his offense history. The principal contribution of the article is to demonstrate that it may be optimal to treat repeat offenders disadvantageously because such a policy serves to enhance deterrence: When an individual contemplates committing an offense in the first period, he will realize that if he is caught, not only will he bear an immediate sanction, but also-because he will have a record-any sanction that he bears in the second period will be higher than it would be otherwise. (C) 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 324
页数:20
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Beccaria Cesare, 1995, CRIMES PUNISHMENTS O
[2]  
Bentham Jeremy., 1948, INTRO PRINCIPLES MOR
[3]  
Burnovski M., 1994, INT REV LAW ECON, V14, P341
[4]  
CHU CY, 1997, UNPUB PUNISHING REPE
[5]  
Fletcher GeorgeP., 2000, RETHINKING CRIMINAL
[6]  
KADISH S, 1983, ENCY CRIME JUSTICE
[7]  
LaFave Wayne R., 1986, Criminal Law, Vsecond
[8]   INCENTIVE GENERATING STATE DEPENDENT PENALTY SYSTEM - THE CASE OF INCOME-TAX EVASION [J].
LANDSBERGER, M ;
MEILIJSON, I .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1982, 19 (03) :333-352
[9]  
Packer HerbertL., 1968, LIMITS CRIMINAL SANC
[10]  
POLINSKY AM, 1991, J PUBLIC ECON, V46, P291